Re: [Ltib] Recommended cvs branch or label for automated integration testing

[Ken Gilmer]

Stuart,

  Ok great, I'll use that date.  I was able to run LTIB headless  
after running it once manually, configuring for my target system, and  
then saving the [ltib root]/.config and the [ltib root]/config/ 
platform/[my target]/.config files.  I run an Ant script that does  
the ltib checkout, then copies my config, and then runs "perl ltib".   
Seems to work well so far.  Next is to incorporate my own packages  
into the mix...

thanks
ken


On Feb 14, 2007, at 3:43 AM, Stuart Hughes wrote:

> Hi Ken,
>
> There are tags for releases that are made into tarballs, they are
> prefixed with rel-.  Currently there's really only rel-6-2-2-sv
>
> I intend to get another one out once I've finished working on some
> changes to the compiler spoofing scheme.
>
> The current HEAD of CVS is probably best, you can use -D20070210 as
> there have not been any updates since then.  This should be stable.
>
> Regards, Stuart
>
> On Tue, 2007-02-13 at 12:12 -0500, Ken Gilmer wrote:
> > Hello ~
> >
> >    I'm incorporating LTIB into or automated integration testing
> > system.  Looking at the CVS repository shows many labels and a few
> > branches.  What label is recommended as a production-quality
> > snapshot?  Does it change over time?
> >
> > thanks
> > ken
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > LTIB home page: http://bitshrine.org
> >
> > Ltib mailing list
> > address@hidden
> > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/ltib