ltib
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [Ltib] NEW LTIB...and Full Toolchain build....


From: Morrison, Tom
Subject: RE: [Ltib] NEW LTIB...and Full Toolchain build....
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 10:19:00 -0400

Hi Stuart,

Again, thanks for all the help!

I tried configuring (./ltib -c) - and tried to configure the things
the way I wanted them...but...

We are using the NFS-ONLY option (we do NOT need an initramfs or 
ramdisk option). While using this - it doesn't seem to give me the
many options to 'deselect' configuration options like:

   'remove the /usr/include directory' 

Which is needed to use with compiler to build my applications.

Is there anyway around this, so I am using the NFS-ONLY - but am
including all the headers/libraries in the rootfs subdirectory?

The alternative is to build with a target image being some other
type of targetimage (initramfs, ramdisk, cramfs?)...

Tom


>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Stuart Hughes [mailto:address@hidden
>> Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 8:56 AM
>> To: Morrison, Tom
>> Cc: address@hidden; address@hidden; address@hidden
>> Subject: Re: [Ltib] NEW LTIB...and Full Toolchain build....
>> 
>> Hi Tom,
>> 
>> The toolchains used in LTIB are standard full cross-compilers.
>> 
>> If you're cross compiling outside of LTIB you can simply find the
path of
>> gcc (look in your LTIB config/platform/_target_) and the flags that
are
>> used and then set the path and call:
>> $CROSS-gcc $TOOLCHAIN_CFLAGS
>> 
>> The compiler toolchain headers will be picked up automatically.  You
>> don't need real kernel headers unless you're building modules.
>> 
>> For some components (libc, kernel headers) ltib has options in
"./ltib -
>> c" to include these in the rootfs.  Note that for the staging NFS
area
>> all the headers/libs will be found in rootfs/ /{lib,include}.  When
you
>> use the cross compiler you'll need to setup -I/-L in some way to
>> reference this area for you (which is what the spoofing does).  The
other
>> thing you may need to consider is pkg-config, which LTIB also spoofs.
>> 
>> Another option if you wish is to run: "./ltib -m shell".  From here
you
>> are setup in the same environment as the ltib builder and so can
simply
>> say: "./configure ; make".  You can exit the shell using "exit".
>> 
>> Regards, Stuart
>> 
>> --- address@hidden wrote:
>> 
>> From: "Morrison, Tom" <address@hidden>
>> To: <address@hidden>
>> Cc: Geary Sean-R60898 <address@hidden>,
Papacharlambous
>> Steve-R61559 <address@hidden>
>> Subject: [Ltib] NEW LTIB...and Full Toolchain build....
>> Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 16:55:02 -0400
>> 
>> Hi everyone...
>> 
>> I have been using a LTIB image from Freescale and have successfully
>> built a rootfs that I am happy with. It is working well enough that
>> we want to use this as our standard rootfs (aka: DISTRO) - which
means
>> that the application(s) - NOT built in LTIB - need to have a full
>> compiler that supports all of the standard Linux utils (e.g.:
binutils)
>> as well as all the include files (i.e.: include/linux/i2c.h)
>> 
>> So, the compiler version supported in this release is 4.2-171 and the
>> target platform is a MPC85xx (E500v2 (SPE=yes))
>> 
>> How do I go about building a full Toolchain for my application to
use?
>> 
>> 
>> Tom
>> 
>> 
>> >> -----Original Message-----
>> >> From: Geary Sean-R60898 [mailto:address@hidden
>> >> Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 12:08 PM
>> >> To: Morrison, Tom; Papacharlambous Steve-R61559
>> >> Cc: McCormick Ralph-R58423
>> >> Subject: RE: [Ltib] GLIBC 2.5
>> >>
>> >> I did use the 171 files but am about to try again with the 187
>> version
>> >>
>> >> Just to verify you are still attempting to build this within LTIB
>> >> correct?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> -----Original Message-----
>> >> From: Morrison, Tom [mailto:address@hidden
>> >> Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 12:03 PM
>> >> To: Geary Sean-R60898; Papacharlambous Steve-R61559
>> >> Cc: McCormick Ralph-R58423
>> >> Subject: RE: [Ltib] GLIBC 2.5
>> >>
>> >> Thank you - thank you - thank you Sean!
>> >>
>> >> I am very grateful that you've been very active with this and
gotten
>> the
>> >> ball rolling (I figured I should at least 'officially' put the SR
in
>> -
>> >> so we can track this...sorry to cross paths with your work...
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Attached is a text file with the failure...
>> >>
>> >> If you look in this file:
>> >>
>> >>
>>
/opt/freescale/usr/local/gcc-4.2.171-eglibc-2.5.171-dp-2/powerpc-none-li
>> >> nux-gnuspe/lib/gcc/powerpc-none-linux-gnuspe/4.2.3/include/spe.h
>> >>
>> >> It seems to be want a definition for
>> >>
>> >>    __ev64_opaque__
>> >>
>> >> And in my 'toolchain' there seems to NOT be a definition for this?
>> >>
>> >> I did follow Steve's instructions (and I used -187 version (not
-171
>> >> that came with the LTIB image - this may be part of the problem)?
>> >>
>> >> T
>> >>
>> >> >> -----Original Message-----
>> >> >> From: Geary Sean-R60898 [mailto:address@hidden
>> >> >> Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 11:46 AM
>> >> >> To: Papacharlambous Steve-R61559; Morrison, Tom
>> >> >> Cc: McCormick Ralph-R58423
>> >> >> Subject: RE: [Ltib] GLIBC 2.5
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Hi Tom,
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I saw the SR that you created and had one of our apps guys grab
>> it..
>> >> >> Also the BSP team has been looking into this issue as well
since
>> last
>> >> >> night when I passed your emails on to them for investigation.
>> This
>> >> >> team is in Beijing so hopefully we'll hear something back
tomorrow
>> >> >> morning in regards to this.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I have been rebuilding glibc and it actually just finished
without
>> >> error
>> >> >> once I installed gawk.   Where in your build does it actually
>> fail?
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Sean
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> -----Original Message-----
>> >> >> From: Papacharlambous Steve-R61559
>> >> >> Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 11:23 AM
>> >> >> To: Morrison, Tom
>> >> >> Cc: Geary Sean-R60898; McCormick Ralph-R58423
>> >> >> Subject: RE: [Ltib] GLIBC 2.5
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Hi Tom,
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Just out of interest I checked how glibc was built in the
>> toolchain,
>> >> and
>> >> >> the following cflags were used to build glibc: "-O -mcpu=8548
>> >> -mspe=yes
>> >> >> -mabi=spe -mhard-float -mfloat-gprs=double" which looks correct
to
>> >> me.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Just a thought but are you building all your user space
packages
>> with
>> >> >> these flags?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Best regards,
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Steve
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Thu, 2009-03-05 at 10:36 -0500, Morrison, Tom wrote:
>> >> >> > Fyi - Prep OK - build failed because spe.h defines something
>> called
>> >> >> > __ev64_opaque__ and this is NOT defined anywhere (so there is
>> still
>> >> >> > some missing patch).....:-(...
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Now I am at the mercy of Sean and Ralph t
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > >> -----Original Message-----
>> >> >> > >> From: Steve Papacharalambous [mailto:address@hidden
>> >> >> > >> Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 7:13 AM
>> >> >> > >> To: Morrison, Tom
>> >> >> > >> Cc: address@hidden
>> >> >> > >> Subject: Re: [Ltib] GLIBC 2.5
>> >> >> > >>
>> >> >> > >> Hi Tom,
>> >> >> > >>
>> >> >> > >> It looks like you are using an iso from Freescale in which
>> case
>> >> you
>> >> >> > need
>> >> >> > >> to get support from Freescale for this iso.  I've put
>> >> instructions
>> >> >> > >> of how to obtain support at the end of this email.
>> >> >> > >>
>> >> >> > >> The decision to use the libraries and headers from the
>> toolchain
>> >> in
>> >> >> > the
>> >> >> > >> target root file system is a deliberate choice to ensure
>> >> >> > compatibility
>> >> >> > >> between the run time environment on the target root file
>> system
>> >> and
>> >> >> > the
>> >> >> > >> executables that are built using the cross toolchain.
>> >> >> > >>
>> >> >> > >> Having said that you should be able to build the glibc
>> package,
>> >> and
>> >> >>
>> >> >> > >> you're right the two patches have not been uploaded to the
>> GPP
>> >> yet.
>> >> >> > >> I'll look into this and get them uploaded for you.  In the
>> >> meantime
>> >> >> > you
>> >> >> > >> can extract these two patches from the toolchain source
rpm
>> >> which
>> >> >> > >> is available from the GPP.  One way to extract these files
is
>> to
>> >> >> > >> use the
>> >> >> > >> following:
>> >> >> > >>
>> >> >> > >> "rpm2cpio freescale-powerpc-linux-gnu-4.2-187.src.rpm |
cpio
>> >> -ivd"
>> >> >> > >>
>> >> >> > >> Obtaining support from Freescale:
>> >> >> > >> ------------
>> >> >> > >> As you are using an iso image downloaded from
>> >> >> > http://www.freescale.com/
>> >> >> > >> you should post support questions by following these
steps:
>> >> >> > >>
>> >> >> > >>    * go to http://www.freescale.com
>> >> >> > >>    * click on "Support / Technical support"
>> >> >> > >>    * click on "Submit a Service Request"
>> >> >> > >>    * register to get a user name and password.
>> >> >> > >>    * login in with your user name and password
>> >> >> > >>    * on the "New Service Request" page:
>> >> >> > >>       * category = Technical Request
>> >> >> > >>       * topic = Linux BSP
>> >> >> > >>       * Click on "Continue"
>> >> >> > >>    * fill out the information for the service request
>> >> >> > >>    * click on the "Submit" button at the bottom of the
page.
>> >> >> > >> ------------
>> >> >> > >>
>> >> >> > >> Best regards,
>> >> >> > >>
>> >> >> > >> Steve
>> >> >> > >>
>> >> >> > >> On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 17:28 -0500, Morrison, Tom wrote:
>> >> >> > >> > I am using an LTIB package from Freescale for the
MPC8572
>> >> (dated
>> >> >> > >> > 121208)...
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> > It seems that the subject line package of this BSP is a
>> >> pre-built
>> >> >> > RPM
>> >> >> > >> > (it doesn't go through
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> > the a full build when using generic <./ltib> build
process.
>> It
>> >> >> > looks
>> >> >> > >> > like this full library gets
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> > untars a pre-built one into the as a uses a pre-built
rpm
>> >> GLIBC
>> >> >> > (and
>> >> >> > >> > an associated native
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> > GCC compiler (whose source is available luckily)...
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> > The problem with this pre-built one is that it was NOT
>> built
>> >> >> > correctly
>> >> >> > >> > for the E500 and/or
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> > with a compiler that supports SPE (correctly)...
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> > I determined this by noticing that when executing
startup
>> >> scripts
>> >> >>
>> >> >> > >> > (executing out of new rootfs),
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> > I am getting multiple math emulation exceptions (when
>> traced
>> >> >> > >> > close
>> >> >> > to
>> >> >> > >> > - it looks like it is
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> > coming from GLIBC type functions).  I determine that
this
>> is
>> >> case
>> >> >> > with
>> >> >> > >> > both the New Linux
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> > Kernel associated with this NEW LTIB Package, and my
older
>> >> (more
>> >> >> > >> > stable) Linux Kernel
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> > which has been thoroughly QA'd..
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> > OK, I can deal with most of those exceptions - but
>> >> unfortunately,
>> >> >>
>> >> >> > >> > there is something I
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> > am trying to execute that is NOT handled correctly with
my
>> >> OLDER
>> >> >> > >> > / more stable
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> > Linux kernel...and thus causes an ILLEGAL instruction
(and
>> >> thus,
>> >> >> > >> > my
>> >> >> > NEW
>> >> >> > >> > user program
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> > is NOT working)...
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> > OK - well, maybe somebody who built this LTIB image took
a
>> >> lazy
>> >> >> > >> > approach - so I decide I
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> > want to try to build the GLIBC again (and make sure it
has
>> all
>> >> >> > >> > the proper configuration switches
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> > to NOT cause this problem)...
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> > So, I try ./ltib -m prep -p glibc
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> > >> Try glibc-2.5.tar.bz2.md5 from the GPP
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> > >> 18:49:52
>> >> >> > >> > >>
URL:http://www.bitshrine.org/gpp/glibc-2.5.tar.bz2.md5
>> >> >> > >> > [51/51] -> "glibc-2.5.tar.bz2.md5" [1]
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> > >> Try glibc-2.5.tar.bz2 from the GPP
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> > And it fails utterly...
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> > I REALLY want to use this OLD/Stable kernel (with the
new
>> LTIB
>> >> >> > rootfs
>> >> >> > >> > (because I can run Java with this version))...
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> > a)     Have I made the proper analysis of this pre-built
>> LTIB
>> >> >> image
>> >> >> > >> > not being built correctly (I KNOW that this is
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> > the source of my math exceptions - 99.5% sure
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> > b)     How do I get a new version
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> > c)     Will this fix my problem?
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> > Here is the spec file that came with the NEW LTIB
image...
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> > %define pfx /opt/freescale/rootfs/%{_target_cpu}
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> > %define cs_version 4.2-187
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> > Summary         : GNU standard C library with NPTL
thread
>> >> >> library.
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> > Name            : glibc
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> > Version         : 2.5
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> > Release         : 1
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> > License         : LGPL
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> > Vendor          : Freescale
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> > Packager        : Stuart Hughes & Steve Papacharalambous
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> > Group           : System Environment/Libraries
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> > Source0         : %{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> > Source1         : %{name}-ports-%{version}.tar.bz2
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> > Source2         : %{name}-libidn-%{version}.tar.bz2
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> > Patch0          :
>> %{name}-%{cs_version}-from-fsf-2_5.diff.gz
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> > Patch1          :
>> >> >> %{name}_ports-%{cs_version}-from-fsf-2_5.diff.gz
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> > BuildRoot       : %{_tmppath}/%{name}
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> > Prefix          : %{pfx}
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> > %Description
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> > %{summary}
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> > This glibc package is built using glibc-2.5 and
>> >> glibc-ports-2.5
>> >> >> > plus
>> >> >> > >> > the
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> > following patches from the CodeSourcery %{cs_version}
>> release:
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> > - glibc-4.2-187-from-fsf-2_5.diff
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> > - glibc_ports-4.2-187-from-fsf-2_5.diff
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> > The glibc and glibc-ports tarballs can be obtained from
any
>> of
>> >> >> > >> > the
>> >> >> > GNU
>> >> >> > >> > ftp
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> > sites or their mirrors.
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> > The CodeSourcery patch can be obtained by downloading
the
>> >> source
>> >> >> > rpm:
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> > freescale-powerpc-linux-gnu-%{cs_version}.src.rpm from:
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> >
>> http://www.codesourcery.com/gnu_toolchains/power/download.html
>> >> >> > >> > and then
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> > extracting the glibc and glibc-ports patchs from this
>> source
>> >> rpm.
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> > %Prep
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> > %setup
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> > %patch0 -p1
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> > tar jxvf %{SOURCE1}
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> > cd glibc-ports-%{version}
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> > %patch1 -p1
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> > cd ..
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> > ln -s glibc-ports-%{version} ports
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> > tar jxvf %{SOURCE2}
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> > ln -s glibc-libidn-%{version} libidn
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> > %Build
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> > # Temporary hack - stevep
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> > # For building toolchain components an optimized version
of
>> >> the
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> > # target is needed.  This should really be defined in
the
>> >> config
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> > # area of ltib, and not done in the toolchain spec
files.
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> > # For now we assume that the optimised target can be
>> derived
>> >> by
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> > # stripping the trailing "-" off the toolchain prefix,
but
>> >> this
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> > # will not be true for all cases, eg when using uClibc
>> >> >> toolchains.
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> > OPT_CFGHOST=`echo ${TOOLCHAIN_PREFIX} | perl -n -e
>> >> >> > >> > 's,-$,,;print'`
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> > # Use the toolchain headers as the default for the glibc
>> >> build.
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> > # TODO: Add a configuration option to allow selection of
>> the
>> >> BSP
>> >> >> > >> > kernel
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> > # headers for the build - stevep
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> > TC_HEADERS_DIR="`dirname \`${TOOLCHAIN_PREFIX}gcc
>> >> >> > ${TOOLCHAIN_CFLAGS}
>> >> >> > >> > -print-file-name=libc.so\` | perl -p -e
>> 's,/lib$,,'`/include"
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> > rm -rf build-glibc
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> > mkdir build-glibc
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> > cd build-glibc
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> > echo "libc_cv_forced_unwind=yes" > config.cache
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> > echo "libc_cv_c_cleanup=yes" >> config.cache
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> > BUILD_CC="${BUILDCC}" \
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> > CFLAGS="-O" \
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> > ../configure \
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> >   --prefix=/usr \
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> >   --build=%{_build} \
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> >   --host=${OPT_CFGHOST} \
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> >   --disable-profile \
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> >   --without-gd \
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> >   --without-cvs \
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> >   --cache-file=config.cache \
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> >   --enable-kernel=2.6.10 \
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> >   --with-headers=${TC_HEADERS_DIR} \
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> >   --enable-add-ons=ports,nptl,libidn
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> > make
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> > %Install
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> > cd build-glibc
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> > make install install_root=${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}/%{pfx}
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> > # remove absolute paths from text search files (if they
>> exist)
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> > perl -w -e '
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> >     @ARGV = grep { `file $_` =~ m,ASCII C program text,
}
>> >> @ARGV;
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> >     exit(0) unless @ARGV;
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> >     $^I = ".bak";
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> >     while(<>) {
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> >         s,[\S/]+/,,g if m,^GROUP,;
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> >         print;
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> >     }
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> >     ' ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}/%{pfx}/lib/libc.so \
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> >       ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}/%{pfx}/lib/libpthread.so \
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> >       ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}/%{pfx}/%{_prefix}/lib/libc.so \
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> >
${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}/%{pfx}/%{_prefix}/lib/libpthread.so
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> > # Remove libtool .la files.
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> > find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{pfx} -name \*.la -exec rm {} \;
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> > %Clean
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> > rm -rf ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> > %Files
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> > %defattr(-,root,root)
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> > %{pfx}/*
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> > Tom Morrison
>> >> >> > >> > Principal Software Engineer
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> > EMPIRIX
>> >> >> > >> > 20 Crosby Drive - Bedford, MA  01730
>> >> >> > >> > p: 781.266.3567 f: 781.266.3670
>> >> >> > >> > email: address@hidden
>> >> >> > >> > www.empirix.com
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> > _______________________________________________
>> >> >> > >> > LTIB home page: http://bitshrine.org
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> > Ltib mailing list
>> >> >> > >> > address@hidden
>> >> >> > >> > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/ltib
>> >> >> > >> --
>> >> >> > >> Steve Papacharalambous
>> >> >> > >> Developer Technology.
>> >> >> > >>
>> >> >> > >> Registered address:
>> >> >> > >> Freescale Semiconductor UK Ltd
>> >> >> > >> Colvilles Road
>> >> >> > >> East Kilbride
>> >> >> > >> Glasgow
>> >> >> > >> Scotland
>> >> >> > >> G75 OTG
>> >> >> > >>
>> >> >> > >> Registration number: SC262720
>> >> >> > >> VAT number: GB831329053
>> >> >> > >>
>> >> >> > >> (X) Public
>> >> >> > >> ( ) Freescale Internal Use Only
>> >> >> > >> ( ) Freescale Confidential Proprietary
>> >> >> > >>
>> >> >> > >>
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> --
>> >> >> Steve Papacharalambous
>> >> >> Developer Technology.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Registered address:
>> >> >> Freescale Semiconductor UK Ltd
>> >> >> Colvilles Road
>> >> >> East Kilbride
>> >> >> Glasgow
>> >> >> Scotland
>> >> >> G75 OTG
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Registration number: SC262720
>> >> >> VAT number: GB831329053
>> >> >>
>> >> >> (X) Public
>> >> >> ( ) Freescale Internal Use Only
>> >> >> ( ) Freescale Confidential Proprietary
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> LTIB home page: http://bitshrine.org
>> 
>> Ltib mailing list
>> address@hidden
>> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/ltib
>> 
>> 





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]