ltib
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Ltib] Problem using LTIB


From: Stuart Hughes
Subject: Re: [Ltib] Problem using LTIB
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 19:41:33 +0100
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080707)

Hi Daniel,

I managed to raise a support ticket and the ISP say they can reproduce
the problem and will look into it.  I will send an update when I hear
any more.

Regards, Stuart

Stuart Hughes wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
> 
> I just tried again today (Sunday at 13:23 UTC) and got 280 KBytes/sec,
> which is better, but still not outstanding.
> 
> I tried to raise a support query with Globat but at the moment I get this:
> 
> Forbidden
> You don't have permission to access /support/index.bml on this server.
> 
> When I tried to submit it.  I'll try again later in the week, maybe
> they're doing maintenance.
> 
> Regards, Stuart
> 
> Stuart Hughes wrote:
>> Hi Daniel,
>>
>> I just tried here (at home) and it bobbed around 36 K Bytes per second,
>> which is slow.  I'll need to investigate, can't promise when I can get
>> to this though as I'm maxed out.
>>
>> Regards, Stuart
>>
>> Daniel Brown wrote:
>>> I'm in California.
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Stuart Hughes [mailto:address@hidden 
>>> Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2010 4:13 AM
>>> To: Aaron Wegner
>>> Cc: address@hidden; Daniel Brown
>>> Subject: Re: [Ltib] Problem using LTIB
>>>
>>> Hi Guys,
>>>
>>> I'll try downloading that test case file as soon as I get some time and
>>> report back.
>>>
>>> It would be interesting to hear from anyone that has recently been
>>> download and gets good bandwidth.
>>>
>>> What's I'd like to figure is whether there's any pattern to this.
>>>
>>> BTW: what's you're location? I'm in the UK.  The server is in California
>>> AFAIK.
>>>
>>> Regards, Stuart
>>>
>>> Aaron Wegner wrote:
>>>> Stuart,
>>>>
>>>> I tried again just now for the fun of it.  I'm using the file
>>>> linux-2.6.13.tar.gz as a test case.  Both sites start out fairly well,
>>>> around 70 KB/sec, but bitshrine.org drops very quickly to 1 KB/sec,
>>> then
>>>> after a while bounces back up to 100 KB/sec, then drops again quickly
>>> to 1
>>>> KB/sec.  I'm estimating an average of 10 KB/sec or less.  Firefox
>>> seems
>>>> capable of completing the download this year, while wget often fails. 
>>>> With kernel.org I'm floating between 40 KB/sec and 460 KB/sec.  Appear
>>> to
>>>> be averaging 120 KB/sec.  It seems like bitshrine.org or globat.com
>>> might
>>>> not play nice with machines if it perceives a lower download rate on
>>> the
>>>> opposite end.  The result is I am basically not able to download from
>>> the
>>>> gpp.  In the past it has worked here.  Maybe it works well if the
>>> network
>>>> is unoccupied.  Would be nice it it worked "better" when the network
>>> is
>>>> occupied.  Seems like if you have a good network life is good and if
>>> you
>>>> don't then you're punished doubly!  I'm not doubting it's related to
>>>> something in our network, but of all the sites I've been to only the
>>> gpp
>>>> is prohibitively slow, so it might be something on that end as well.
>>> I
>>>> used to download from work without an issue and have downloaded in the
>>>> past from home without an issue.  The whole time I've been typing this
>>>> email I'm at 11% on my kernel.  The toolchains are even bigger.
>>>>
>>>> Aaron
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Aaron,
>>>>>
>>>>> All I can say is that when I nearly always get good bandwidth (a few
>>>>> hundred Kb/s).  I have regularly had ltib download toolchains at good
>>>>> download rates.
>>>>>
>>>>> The most likely cause is related to your network infrastructure
>>>>> (firewalls etc).
>>>>>
>>>>> The ISP for bitshrine is globat.com, most of the time they're very
>>> good.
>>>>>  However if you can see anything incorrect, it might be worth
>>> contacting
>>>>> them and letting them know.
>>>>>
>>>>> BTW: can you try from another physical location.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards, Stuart
>>>>>
>>>>> Aaron Wegner wrote:
>>>>>> Guys, I have encountered something similar as well.  I took a guess
>>> that
>>>>>> it might be ipv6 related, so I disabled that, but really no
>>> significant
>>>>>> improvement.  I guessed that because about 2 months ago I tried
>>>>>> debugging
>>>>>> the same issue and it seemed like some of the Windows machines here
>>> had
>>>>>> more luck with the download rates than my Linux machine was having.
>>> Now
>>>>>> I
>>>>>> can't reproduce that behavior.  Today I've tried Windows, Debian
>>> Linux,
>>>>>> and Fedora Linux.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I don't know how the handshakes work, but it seems like periodically
>>> the
>>>>>> transfer rate is renegotiated, and always to a very low rate.  Now
>>> I'm
>>>>>> achieving 5 KB/sec from bitshrine.org.  Other sites work better for
>>> me,
>>>>>> about 300 KB/sec from kernel.org.  I have resorted to downloading my
>>>>>> .tar.gz files from other sites on the Internet, but the biggest
>>> problem
>>>>>> for me is the toolchain, which I would like to get from
>>> bitshrine.org,
>>>>>> as
>>>>>> I don't really know where else to look for the exact same files.
>>> 100 MB
>>>>>> at 5 KB/sec means I'll have it next week.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Is it possible that bitshrine.org does not allow renegotiation of
>>>>>> download
>>>>>> rate often enough?  I don't know enough about it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Aaron
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Daniel,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Normally the bandwidth is pretty good from that ISP, so it's worth
>>>>>>> checking your network.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Glad you found the problem.  Ideally LTIB could be improved to look
>>> to
>>>>>>> see if wget times out and report that, rather than stumbling on and
>>>>>>> failing the md5sum check.  At least there is a check though so it
>>>>>>> prevents untaring *rap.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards, Stuart
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Daniel Brown wrote:
>>>>>>>> Stuart,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Actually, I finally discovered the problem. The download wasn't
>>>>>>>> finishing
>>>>>>>> due either to my network or to the server. The download transfer
>>> rates
>>>>>>>> were all over the place but at their worst were 1 KB/sec and the
>>>>>>>> connection
>>>>>>>> was timing out. I guess the wgets program doesn't catch or send an
>>>>>>>> appropriate
>>>>>>>> signal on connection termination but the script, thinking the file
>>> was
>>>>>>>> downloaded, probably did an MD5 checksum on a partially downloaded
>>>>>>>> file.
>>>>>>>> I edited the wgets options to remove the non-verbose mode and
>>> improve
>>>>>>>> the timeout of only 12 seconds. This did better but for some
>>> reason
>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> connections still timed out. There is something wrong with our
>>> network
>>>>>>>> which
>>>>>>>> I am having IT look into. After several tries I was finally able
>>> to
>>>>>>>> get
>>>>>>>> LTIB to download all the necessary RPMs and finish the compile.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks for the help.
>>>>>>>> Daniel
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>>>> From: Stuart Hughes [mailto:address@hidden
>>>>>>>> Sent: Saturday, August 21, 2010 3:53 AM
>>>>>>>> To: Daniel Brown
>>>>>>>> Cc: address@hidden; address@hidden
>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [Ltib] Problem using LTIB
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi Daniel,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> That is just for installation so you can run /mnt/ltib/install.
>>> Make
>>>>>>>> when you run the installer you are in some area with local disk
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Also, in the output I see the warning:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>     Ideally the rpm database should not be located in an NFS
>>> mounted
>>>>>>>>>     filesystem.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>     On some systems this may cause cause problems due to
>>> filesystem
>>>>>>>> locking
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If you can avoid running on an NFS area, you'll have less problems
>>> as
>>>>>>>> your IT department can setup all sorts of restrictions.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Finally the message:
>>>>>>>>>     ERROR: md5sum mismatch, re-naming
>>>>>>>>>     /opt/ltib/pkgs/tc-fsl-x86lnx-armeabi-nptl-4.1.2-3.i386.rpm to
>>>>>>>>>
>>> /opt/ltib/pkgs/tc-fsl-x86lnx-armeabi-nptl-4.1.2-3.i386.rpm.bad,
>>>>>>>>>     please re-try
>>>>>>>> This shows there was some kind of download error.  Can you take a
>>> look
>>>>>>>> at the .bad file (run file and see what it is, check the size).
>>> The
>>>>>>>> idea is to see if the http server returned an error (which will be
>>> in
>>>>>>>> the .bad file).  One possibility is that you need to set up a web
>>>>>>>> proxy
>>>>>>>> (does your browser use one?).  The other possibility is that the
>>>>>>>> download aborted for lack of disk space or some other reason (IT
>>> quota
>>>>>>>> policy etc?).
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regards, Stuart
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Daniel Brown wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Hi Peter,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I do have the following in my list of mounted devices:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> /home/dbrown/Freescale/MPC8313E_RDB_K26_20081226-LTIB.iso on
>>>>>>>>> /mnt/ltib
>>>>>>>>> type iso9660 (rw,loop=/dev/loop0)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> This was for the Freescale LTIB distribution that I downloaded
>>>>>>>>> before.
>>>>>>>>> Is it possible that this is the problem?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Daniel
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> *From:* Peter Barada [mailto:address@hidden
>>>>>>>>> *Sent:* Friday, August 20, 2010 11:07 AM
>>>>>>>>> *To:* Daniel Brown
>>>>>>>>> *Cc:* Jorge A. Castro; address@hidden
>>>>>>>>> *Subject:* RE: [Ltib] Problem using LTIB
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 2010-08-20 at 10:55 -0700, Daniel Brown wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Jorge,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I am using Redhat Enterprise Workstation. Is this dist okay?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> My network connection is fine on this machine. I have checked.
>>> But
>>>>>>>>> how
>>>>>>>>> can I check connection to the webite for
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> getting the tc-fsl package?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> in the get_remote() function in bin/Ltibutils.pm, if you add a
>>> "set
>>>>>>>>> -x"
>>>>>>>>> to the shell commands that call wget, thereby seingo the wget
>>> command
>>>>>>>>> used to fetch the file from the GPP(note the bolded "set -x" in
>>> the
>>>>>>>>> following):
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> sub get_remote
>>>>>>>>> {
>>>>>>>>>     my($dest, $pxys, $wget_opts, $pxmode, $url) = @_;
>>>>>>>>>     return system_nb(<<TXT) == 0;
>>>>>>>>> *set -x*
>>>>>>>>> cd $dest
>>>>>>>>> $pxys wget $wget_opts --proxy=$pxmode $url 2>&1
>>>>>>>>> cd - >/dev/null
>>>>>>>>> TXT
>>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> >From what you've sent, it looks like you wee able to downloaded
>>> the
>>>>>>>>> file, its a mismatch of the md5sum that's causing the renaming.
>>> I'm
>>>>>>>>> guessing that you have an LTIB .iso image - are the line endings
>>>>>>>>> incorrect (i.e. finding DOS line endings (CRLF) instead of Unix
>>> line
>>>>>>>>> endings (LF only))?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> If a mismatch is found, LTIB moves the filename (by appending
>>> ".bad"
>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>> it), so the next run of LTIB should pull it down again, and
>>> hopefully
>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>> will match.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Daniel
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>     *From:address@hidden
>>>>>>>>>     [mailto:address@hidden *On
>>>>>>>>> Behalf
>>>>>>>>>     Of *Jorge A. Castro
>>>>>>>>>     *Sent:* Friday, August 20, 2010 9:31 AM
>>>>>>>>>     *To:* address@hidden
>>>>>>>>>     *Subject:* Re: [Ltib] Problem using LTIB
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>     Hi Daniel,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>     It seems like LTIB it's not getting
>>>>>>>>>     tc-fsl-x86lnx-armeabi-nptl-4.1.2-3.i386.rpm, because it shows
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>     Can't get: tc-fsl-x86lnx-armeabi-nptl-4.1.2-3.i386.rpm at
>>> ./ltib
>>>>>>>>>     line 2628.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>     You may check your connection  or the availability of the
>>>>>>>>> package.
>>>>>>>>>     Bytheway, what are you using in you host machine? (what
>>> GNU/Linux
>>>>>>>>>     flavor distribution?)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>     Regards,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>     Jorge Castro
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>     On 08/20/2010 10:16 AM, Daniel Brown wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>     Hello,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>     I downloaded and having tried using ltib to build a
>>> configuration
>>>>>>>>>     for the LPC3250 target.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>     I get the following transcript after the gui exits. Can
>>> anyone
>>>>>>>>> help?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>     -------
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>     [bash-3.2:dbrown:ltib]$ ./ltib
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>     Installing host support packages.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>     This only needs to be done once per host, but may take up to
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>     an hour to complete ...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>     If an error occurs, a log file with the full output may be
>>> found
>>>>>>>>> in:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>     /home/dbrown/ltib/host_config.log
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>     *** End of configuration.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>     *** Check the top-level Makefile for additional configuration
>>>>>>>>> options.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>     + '[' -n '' ']'
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>     + '[' '!' -f config/platform/ea3250/.config -a -f
>>>>>>>>>     config/platform/ea3250/defconfig ']'
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>     + cp config/platform/ea3250/defconfig
>>>>>>>>> config/platform/ea3250/.config
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>     + '[' -f /home/dbrown/ltib/config/.config ']'
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>     + '[' -n '' ']'
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>     + cd config/platform/ea3250
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>     + mconf main.lkc .config
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>     *** End of configuration.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>     *** Check the top-level Makefile for additional configuration
>>>>>>>>> options.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>     + cp .config defconfig.dev
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>     Ideally the rpm database should not be located in an NFS
>>> mounted
>>>>>>>>>     filesystem.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>     On some systems this may cause cause problems due to
>>> filesystem
>>>>>>>>> locking
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>     and this application.  If you have this problem, you'll see
>>> error
>>>>>>>>>     messages like: "error: cannot get exclusive lock on
>>>>>>>>> ..../Packages"
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>     Press <enter to continue>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>     Installing: tc-fsl-x86lnx-armeabi-nptl-4.1.2-3.i386.rpm
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>     Testing network connectivity for gpp
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>     OK GPP: is available
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>     Try tc-fsl-x86lnx-armeabi-nptl-4.1.2-3.i386.rpm from the GPP
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>     ERROR: md5sum mismatch, re-naming
>>>>>>>>>     /opt/ltib/pkgs/tc-fsl-x86lnx-armeabi-nptl-4.1.2-3.i386.rpm to
>>>>>>>>>
>>> /opt/ltib/pkgs/tc-fsl-x86lnx-armeabi-nptl-4.1.2-3.i386.rpm.bad,
>>>>>>>>>     please re-try
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>     Can't get: tc-fsl-x86lnx-armeabi-nptl-4.1.2-3.i386.rpm at
>>> ./ltib
>>>>>>>>>     line 2628.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>     Died at ./ltib line 2628.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>     traceback:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>      main::check_toolchain_setup:2628
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>       main::pre_build_checks:1486
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>        main:564
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>     Started: Fri Aug 20 07:20:07 2010
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>     Ended:   Fri Aug 20 07:43:11 2010
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>     Elapsed: 1384 seconds
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>     VERSION          : 10.1.1
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>     CVS_VERSION      : $Revision: 1.70 $ (Savannah)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>     PLATFORM         : ea3250
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>     GNUTARCH         : arm
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>     TOOLCHAIN        :
>>> tc-fsl-x86lnx-armeabi-nptl-4.1.2-3.i386.rpm
>>>>>>>>>     TOOLCHAIN_CFLAGS : -O2 -fsigned-char -mfloat-abi=softfp
>>> -mfpu=vfp
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>     Build Failed
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>     Exiting on error or interrupt
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>     [bash-3.2:dbrown:ltib]$
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>     _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>     LTIB home page: http://ltib.org
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>     Ltib mailing list
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>     address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>     http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/ltib
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>     --
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>     Jorge A. Castro
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>     Canam-Technology, Inc.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>     _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>     LTIB home page: http://ltib.org
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>     Ltib mailing list
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>     address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>     http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/ltib
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>> LTIB home page: http://ltib.org
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Ltib mailing list
>>>>>>>>> address@hidden
>>>>>>>>> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/ltib
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> LTIB home page: http://ltib.org
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Ltib mailing list
>>>>>>> address@hidden
>>>>>>> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/ltib
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> LTIB home page: http://ltib.org
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ltib mailing list
>>>>>> address@hidden
>>>>>> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/ltib
>>>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> LTIB home page: http://ltib.org
>>>>
>>>> Ltib mailing list
>>>> address@hidden
>>>> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/ltib
>>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> LTIB home page: http://ltib.org
>>
>> Ltib mailing list
>> address@hidden
>> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/ltib
>>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> LTIB home page: http://ltib.org
> 
> Ltib mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/ltib
> 



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]