ltib
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Ltib] LTIB rpm-fs build fail CentOS 6.2


From: Henri Kjellberg
Subject: Re: [Ltib] LTIB rpm-fs build fail CentOS 6.2
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 08:33:57 -0500

Hi Stuart,

The version of CentOS is 6.2. I'll have to get the more detailed logs a little later. I have confirmed that LTIB does install without any issues on OpenSuse 12.1, so I'm moving forward with that for now.

Best,
Henri

On Wednesday, June 20, 2012, Stuart Hughes wrote:
Hi Henri,

Which version of CentOS is this?

Also can you cut and paste a bit more from the host_config.log.  Most useful would be just before the first error occurs and a couple of pages from then on.

Regards, Stuart

On 19/06/12 22:27, Henri Kjellberg wrote:
Hello,

I am attempting to install LTIB and getting the following build failure as shown below. It appears that CentOS also has the rpm-fs problem that I have seen in LTIB mailing list. Anyone figure out how to move forward with this?


Processing platform: host support
===================================

Processing: rpm-fs
====================
Build path taken because: no prebuilt rpm, 
Can't get: rpm-4.0.4.tar.gz at ./ltib line 834.
Died at ./ltib line 2538.
traceback:
 main::check_rpm_setup:2538
  main::host_checks:1520
   main:561


Started: Tue Jun 19 16:06:06 2012
Ended:   Tue Jun 19 16:06:06 2012
Elapsed: 0 seconds

Use of uninitialized value in concatenation (.) or string at ./ltib line 2858.
Use of uninitialized value in concatenation (.) or string at ./ltib line 2858.
VERSION          : 11.4.1
CVS_VERSION      : $Revision: 1.86 $ (Savannah)
PLATFORM         : host
GNUTARCH         : i686
TOOLCHAIN        : 
TOOLCHAIN_CFLAGS : 

These packages failed to build:
rpm-fs 

Build Failed



Best,
Henri

_______________________________________________ LTIB home page: http://ltib.org Ltib mailing list address@hidden https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/ltib


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]