lwip-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [lwip-devel] [bug #21307] tcp connect problem


From: Goldschmidt Simon
Subject: RE: [lwip-devel] [bug #21307] tcp connect problem
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 08:22:54 +0200

That seems like it could be a problem with the changed nagle algorithm.
While I didn't see that problem yet, I'll try to reproduce it tonight.

Simon

> 
> URL:
>   <http://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?21307>
> 
>                  Summary: tcp connect problem
>                  Project: lwIP - A Lightweight TCP/IP stack
>             Submitted by: phant
>             Submitted on: Wednesday 10/10/07 at 02:40
>                 Category: TCP
>                 Severity: 3 - Normal
>               Item Group: Change Request
>                   Status: None
>                  Privacy: Public
>              Assigned to: None
>              Open/Closed: Open
>          Discussion Lock: Any
>          Planned Release: 
> 
>     _______________________________________________________
> 
> Details:
> 
> Hi all:
>       I use the new version from cvs.but find when use tcp 
> connect,only two handshake,SYN->SYN+ACK,not send ACK,I change 
> the tcp_process function as
> follow:
> 
> tcp_process(struct tcp_pcb *pcb)
> {
> ...
> 
> switch (pcb->state)
> {
>   case SYN_SENT:
>        ...
>        tcp_ack(pcb);
>        ...
>        break;
>   case SYN_RCD:
>        ...
> 
> }
> 
> I change "tcp_ack(pcb)" to "tcp_ack_now(pcb)",it can generate 
> three handshake,do you agree?
> }
> 
> 
> 
> 
>     _______________________________________________________
> 
> Reply to this item at:
> 
>   <http://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?21307>
> 
> _______________________________________________
>   Message sent via/by Savannah
>   http://savannah.nongnu.org/
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> lwip-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-devel
> 




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]