[lwip-devel] [patch #6250] MSG_MORE flag for send

[Frédéric Bernon]

Follow-up Comment #4, patch #6250 (project lwip):

Yes, last patch seems good, except some minor things:

- I don't understand your changes in sockets.h

- I think it's better to use NETCONN_COPY in sockets.c (and not directly
API_FLAG_COPY)

- some comments don't seem to be explicit enought : "@param apiflags 2 if PSH
flag should be set on last segment, 1 if data must be copied, 0 if data is
non-volatile and can be referenced"

Last, I think we could find some better names for API_FLAG_xxx and for
apiflags (but, I don't have an idea now).





    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <http://savannah.nongnu.org/patch/?6250>

_______________________________________________
  Message posté via/par Savannah
  http://savannah.nongnu.org/