Re: [lwip-devel] possible issue in sockets.c

[Simon Goldschmidt]

Sylvain Rochet wrote:

> Considering the lack of documentation on this point, meaning there is a 
> lot of system and ports in the wild with a critical section 
> implementation without this requirement taken into consideration, I 
> consider following the Albert proposal to be the best we can do.

The reason I'm so hesitant is that we once had a bug around these lines which 
went unnoticed for some time and I don't want to revert to what we had before 
the fix. Could someone please create a bug entry so that this doesn't get 
forgotten? We should dig up the old bug to compare what was the problem there 
and what the fix was.

Simon