Re: [lwip-devel] 6lowpan support in lwip

[address@hidden]

Ivan Delamer wrote:
> I have done testing/development with Atmel ARM boards.

Have you tested your implementation against itself (2 instances) or 
against other products, too? I'm just starting to read up on 6lowpan and 
I'm slightly confused that you seem to have implemented only FRAG1/FRAGN 
encoding and it works...

Also, yet I failed to read from the RFCs which parts of the spec one 
needs to implement and which not. E.g. you don't have the mesh routing 
header implemented. Have you run your tests with or without encryption? 
When encryption is enabled, how do we calculate the max. fragment size?

How do you want to proceed with the code? Dirk just committed it since 
it doesn't hurt (the way he restructured the input path). Do you plan on 
continuing this? Is it OK if I give my 2 cent (e.g. splitting functions, 
adding comments, changing literals to defines, etc.) or should we review 
changes on savannah?

Simon