[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[lwip-users] Re: [lwip] UDP socket for writing only.
From: |
Aleksander Wysocki |
Subject: |
[lwip-users] Re: [lwip] UDP socket for writing only. |
Date: |
Wed, 08 Jan 2003 23:24:54 -0000 |
> > if you do not call recv(), incoming datagrams will be just discarded.
> > (maybe some amount (for example one - it depends of the implementation)
> > will be hold in hope you will recv them, but for sure they will not eat
up
> > your memory)
>
> Also, if something is sending datagrams to you when your application is
> not expecting them suggestions there is something wrong with your
> application level protocol. If it is correct for datagrams to be
> delivered to this socket, then I would have thought you would be
> interested in them, rather than wanting them to be discarded.
>>the socket? If so then as I see that my program will never return from
>>"recv" function till there are data for this socket received. In other
words
>>it is a blocking call. Should I use another thread in multitasking
>>environment just for receiving an information through "recv" function in
>>this case?
after second thought i think he thinks about functionality of select().
O.
[This message was sent through the lwip discussion list.]