[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[lwip-users] RE: [lwip] RTO by Retransmissions ?
From: |
Steve Langstaff |
Subject: |
[lwip-users] RE: [lwip] RTO by Retransmissions ? |
Date: |
Thu, 09 Jan 2003 00:07:31 -0000 |
No, I don't think you want to be shifting *anything* by 64 bits!
--
Steve Langstaff.
-----Original Message-----
From: Kieran Mansley [mailto:address@hidden
Sent: 22 November 2002 11:34
To: address@hidden
Subject: Re: [lwip] RTO by Retransmissions ?
On Fri, 22 Nov 2002 address@hidden wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I think Peder Kruse did indeed found a bug.
>
> Can some of the TCP people confirm this?
>
>
> { 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, 64, 64, 64, 64, 64, 64 };
>
> must be
>
> {0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 6, 6, 6, 6, 6 };
Or we change rto to be a u32_t?
Kieran
[This message was sent through the lwip discussion list.]
[This message was sent through the lwip discussion list.]
- [lwip-users] RE: [lwip] RTO by Retransmissions ?,
Steve Langstaff <=