[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[lwip-users] [lwip] threads question
From: |
Tim Newsham |
Subject: |
[lwip-users] [lwip] threads question |
Date: |
Thu, 09 Jan 2003 00:41:37 -0000 |
Hi,
I'm porting lwIP to a system and I have some questions reguarding
threads. I will have a seperate thread handling the timers
(tight loop with sleeps and calls to the arp and tcp timer functions),
a seperate thread doing ethernet reads (blocking read on an ethernet
device) and a seperate thread waiting for user requests and processing
them through the IP stack (ie. create tcb, bind to port, establish
connection..).
My question is about locking. I see that there is some locking
built in to the system, but it seems like most of this has to do
with the API library. I will not be using the API library. Looking
over the code, at fast glance it doesnt seem like I will be safe
to have the reader thread call into ip_input at the same time
as another thread may be calling into raw api functions to setup
tcbs.
- Is lwip designed to be able to handle multiple threads in
this manner (at first glance it doesnt seem to).
- should I just have a big lock that all threads grab before
calling into lwip functions?
- should I just define away the sys_sem_t operations as nops
when using the big lock?
Tim N.
[This message was sent through the lwip discussion list.]
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [lwip-users] [lwip] threads question,
Tim Newsham <=