[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[lwip-users] Re: [lwip] pbuf questions
From: |
leon . woestenberg |
Subject: |
[lwip-users] Re: [lwip] pbuf questions |
Date: |
Wed, 08 Jan 2003 23:57:59 -0000 |
Hello David,
I would be in favor of dropping the current PBUF_RAM and moving towards a
pool of several fixed size pool sizes (32, 64, 128, 256, 512 for example) of
type PBUF_POOL.
Besides that, PBUF_ROM (with a reference to constant header and/or payload),
PBUF_REF (with a reference to application-memory for zero-copy
header/payload data).
As the pbufs are central to lwIP and come back in about every module, a
simple but effective approach really helps further development on the stack.
Your idea is therefore very good.
Sorry I didn't really answer your question, but I'll try to put some effort
in documenting the pbufs in the CVS.
Regards, Leon.
--
+++ GMX - Mail, Messaging & more http://www.gmx.net +++
NEU: Mit GMX ins Internet. Rund um die Uhr für 1 ct/ Min. surfen!
[This message was sent through the lwip discussion list.]