lwip-users
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[lwip-users] PBUF_REF: udp_send() has pbuf_dechain() removed. Why?


From: leon . woestenberg
Subject: [lwip-users] PBUF_REF: udp_send() has pbuf_dechain() removed. Why?
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2003 13:52:42 +0100


Hello David,

testing our code against the latest CVS version, we ended up with an
assertion failure all the time.

in udp.c 1.24 to 1.25 udp_send() was changed to have the call to
pbuf_dechain() removed:

  /* dechain and free the header pbuf */
  if(hdr != NULL) {
    ////////   pbuf_dechain(hdr);
    pbuf_free(hdr);
  }

Now, the whole chain is freed, after which the application again frees
its pointer to its own pbuf, resulting in an assertion failure in pbuf_free()!

David, why did you remove the dechain()?

Regards,

Leon Woestenberg

Axon Digital Design
Phone: +31 13 511 6666
Fax: +31 13 511 4151
web: www.axon.tv

================================================================================
=====================
The information contained in this communication is confidential and is intended
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Axon
Digital Design Group is neither liable for the proper nor for the complete
transmission of the information contained in this communication nor for any
delay in its receipt. Axon Digital Design Group does not guarantee that the
integrity of this communication has been maintained nor that the communication
is free of viruses, interceptions or interference. If you are not the intended
recipient of this communication, you are hereby notified that reading,
disseminating, distributing or copying this message is strictly prohibited. In
that case please return the communication to the sender and delete and destroy
all copies. In carrying out its engagements, Axon Digital Design Group applies
general terms and conditions, which contain a clause that limits its liability.
A copy of these terms and conditions is available on request free of charge.
================================================================================
=====================

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]