[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lwip-users] problems and solutions (?)
From: |
Leon Woestenberg |
Subject: |
Re: [lwip-users] problems and solutions (?) |
Date: |
Tue, 10 Aug 2004 16:40:16 +0200 |
Hello Uwe,
On Tue, 2004-08-10 at 16:29, Uwe Roth wrote:
> Are there any applications or drivers where a definition of
>
> #define PBUF_LINK_HLEN 0
>
> makes any sense?
>
Probably not, thanks for reporting.
Changed in HEAD (will probably follow in 0.7.x branch):
/* PBUF_LINK_HLEN: the number of bytes that should be allocated for a
link level header. Defaults to 14 for Ethernet. */
#ifndef PBUF_LINK_HLEN
#define PBUF_LINK_HLEN 14
#endif
Regards,
Leon.
- Re: [lwip-users] simrouter and simnode don't build, (continued)
- Re: [lwip-users] simrouter and simnode don't build, K.J. Mansley, 2004/08/10
- Re: [lwip-users] simrouter and simnode don't build, Jani Monoses, 2004/08/10
- Re: [lwip-users] simrouter and simnode don't build, K.J. Mansley, 2004/08/10
- Re: [lwip-users] simrouter and simnode don't build, alex katebi, 2004/08/10
- Re: [lwip-users] simrouter and simnode don't build, K.J. Mansley, 2004/08/10
- Re: [lwip-users] simrouter and simnode don't build, alex katebi, 2004/08/10
RE: [lwip-users] simrouter and simnode don't build, olivier . hachet2, 2004/08/10