lwip-users
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [lwip-users] Has any work been done on allowing sendandreceiveona si


From: Taranowski, Thomas (SWCOE)
Subject: RE: [lwip-users] Has any work been done on allowing sendandreceiveona single port
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 17:37:17 -0500

Have you looked into using select() to monitor the range of ports?
That's the typical solution.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: address@hidden
> [mailto:address@hidden
On
> Behalf Of Julian Gardner [RSD]
> Sent: Monday, January 21, 2008 4:12 AM
> To: Mailing list for lwIP users
> Subject: RE: [lwip-users] Has any work been done on allowing
> sendandreceiveona single port
> 
> and 5 tasks? dont want to stop the main code running.
> 
> Julian Gardner
> 
> RSD Communications Ltd
> Unit 2
> 8 BorrowMeadow Road
> Springkerse Industrial Estate
> Stirling, Scotland FK7 7UW
> 
> Tel   +44 [0]1786 450572 Ext 238 (Main)
> Fax   +44 [0]1786 474653
> GSM   +44 [0]7836 240907
> 
> Email address@hidden
> Skype joolzg
> MSN   address@hidden
> WWW   http://www.rsd.tv   http://www.rsdtv.com
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: address@hidden
> > [mailto:address@hidden On Behalf
> > Of Kieran Mansley
> > Sent: 21 January 2008 12:06
> > To: Mailing list for lwIP users
> > Subject: RE: [lwip-users] Has any work been done on allowing
> > sendandreceiveon a single port
> >
> > On Mon, 2008-01-21 at 11:42 +0000, Julian Gardner [RSD] wrote:
> > > Sorry if I have not explained better
> > >
> > > What i have is a unit which needs to talk to a master unit
> > on a fixed
> > > port, I open the port as per my code and have a task running which
> > > loops around looking at the read flags until i have some data,
once
> > > this is received i process the data and then send back a
> > status block,
> > > using lwip_write!
> > >
> > > I have posted my code which currently runs on port 5000, the
reason
> > > for the task and code is i may need to monitor a block of ports,
> > > 5000-5004
> >
> > Probably easiest just to have 5 sockets then, one on each port.
> >
> > Kieran
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > lwip-users mailing list
> > address@hidden
> > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
> >
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> lwip-users mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]