Re: [lwip-users] sys_msleep() implementation

[Marko Panger]

Hi,

In the original implementation it blocks anyway by pending on semaphore. 
The effect is the same. Its just the implementation as I see it, but I 
could be wrong.

marko

Piero 74 wrote:
> Hi marko
>
> the comment of this function said:
>
>  * Sleep for some ms. Timeouts are processed while sleeping.
>  *
>  
> (and you can see how work in the lwip code)
> Lwip needs to checks its timeout list during sleep operation, so, you 
> cannot block it using RTOS delay
>
> Someone can confirm my answer?
>
> Bye, Piero.
>
> 2008/5/6 Marko Panger <address@hidden 
> <mailto:address@hidden>>:
>
>     Hi all,
>
>     I was looking at the implementation of sys_msleep() function in
>     sys.c. As per default in crates
>     a semaphore and then pends on it for the timeout value. Could I
>     redefine this function in sys_arch.c
>     to better suit my RTOS or is there any particular reason for such
>     implementation ?
>
>     For example I would implement it as:
>
>     void sys_msleep(u32_t ms) {
>       TSK_Sleep(ms);   }
>
>     Any thoughts ?
>
>     Thanks,
>     Marko
>
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     lwip-users mailing list
>     address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>
>     http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> lwip-users mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users