Re: [lwip-users] CORE_LOCKING

[Kieran Mansley]

On Thu, 2011-07-14 at 00:23 -0700, timmy brolin wrote:
> Perhaps it would make sense to enable CORE_LOCKING individually on
> those for interfaces?
> That way CORE_LOCKING can be enabled for lets say tcpip_input and
> netifapi, while still keeping the message passing in netconn and
> socket.

Do people typically use more than one of those APIs in the same project?

I would rather get it working reliably on all interfaces, than increase
complexity further by allowing its use selectively.

Kieran