[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lwip-users] lwIP RAW API and "deferred processing" indifferentconte
From: |
Kieran Mansley |
Subject: |
Re: [lwip-users] lwIP RAW API and "deferred processing" indifferentcontext |
Date: |
Wed, 7 Dec 2011 16:10:49 +0000 |
On 7 Dec 2011, at 16:05, Gisle Vanem wrote:
> I would think using non-blocking sockets (espesially in servers) would be
> more effective compared to spawning a separate thread for each connection.
> I would love to see a change for having sockets with NO_SYS=1.
A solution that doesn't support blocking semantics isn't a useful one. The
whole point of the sockets API is that it works the same way on all platforms,
making porting the application and writing code against a familiar API easy.
lwIP already has more specialised APIs that are tailored to deliver higher
performance and lower overheads, which people are encouraged to use, but the
sockets API needs to be as close to the BSD sockets standard as possible.
Kieran
- [lwip-users] lwIP RAW API and "deferred processing" in different context, Ueli Niederer, 2011/12/07
- Re: [lwip-users] lwIP RAW API and "deferred processing" in different context, Simon Goldschmidt, 2011/12/07
- Re: [lwip-users] lwIP RAW API and "deferred processing" in differentcontext, Gisle Vanem, 2011/12/07
- Re: [lwip-users] lwIP RAW API and "deferred processing" in differentcontext, Kieran Mansley, 2011/12/07
- Re: [lwip-users] lwIP RAW API and "deferred processing" in differentcontext, Simon Goldschmidt, 2011/12/07
- Re: [lwip-users] lwIP RAW API and "deferred processing" indifferentcontext, Gisle Vanem, 2011/12/07
- Re: [lwip-users] lwIP RAW API and "deferred processing" indifferentcontext,
Kieran Mansley <=
- Re: [lwip-users] lwIP RAW API and "deferred processing" indifferentcontext, Ueli Niederer, 2011/12/08
- Re: [lwip-users] lwIP RAW API and "deferred processing" indifferentcontext, mat henshall, 2011/12/08
- Re: [lwip-users] lwIP RAW API and "deferred processing" indifferentcontext, junix, 2011/12/08
- Re: [lwip-users] lwIP RAW API and "deferred processing" indifferentcontext, mat henshall, 2011/12/08
- Re: [lwip-users] lwIP RAW API and "deferred processing" indifferentcontext, Ueli Niederer, 2011/12/08