Re: [lwip-users] flow of lwip as a stream client

[Simon Goldschmidt]

"Bill Auerbach" <address@hidden> wrote:
> It seems from reading this discussion that perhaps tcp_recved is badly
> named.  It's not that it's been received but that it's been processed.  I
> would think tcp_processed (or similar) would convey a better meaning as to
> what this function is accomplishing.

I always thought so, but as an integral part of the lwIP tcp raw API, it would 
be tough to change its name...

Simon
-- 
Empfehlen Sie GMX DSL Ihren Freunden und Bekannten und wir
belohnen Sie mit bis zu 50,- Euro! https://freundschaftswerbung.gmx.de