Re: [lwip-users] lwip-users Digest, Vol 107, Issue 32

[Kieran Mansley]

On Thu, 2012-07-26 at 09:04 -0400, Chen wrote:
> Simon, thanks for your reply.
> 
> is setsockopt( sock, IPPROTO_TCP, TCP_NODELAY, (char *)&flag, 
> sizeof(flag) ) the same as tcp_nagle_disable(myconn->pcb.tcp)?
> 
> I already have tcp_nagle_disable(myconn->pcb.tcp) in my codes when I 
> observed packets size alternating between 200 and 1400 bytes

Yes, they should be the same.  A packet capture might show something
interesting.

Kieran