[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lwip-users] lwip and MPU (FreeRTOS-MPU)
From: |
Simon Goldschmidt |
Subject: |
Re: [lwip-users] lwip and MPU (FreeRTOS-MPU) |
Date: |
Thu, 30 Aug 2012 12:46:50 +0200 |
jblackarty wrote:
> My aim is to form a something like "network domain", which will
> include lwip, ethernet driver, network-related application threads and
> associated data. Their crash must be separated from the entire system.
Given the nature of network communication, for such clean separation, you would
have to create an API layer that does not need communicating threads to share
memory with lwIP. The most tricky part here would be sharing TX/RX data between
those threads: to prevent having a priviledged-mode handler copying the data
between protection regions, you would have to adapt memory protection on the
fly (i.e. or TX data, TX pbuf's contents may be written by the application
thread and read by lwIP, for RX, lwIP may write and the application may read
only).
However, although this seems interesting, lwIP's design is far away from this
(yet?).
Simon
- Re: [lwip-users] lwip and MPU (FreeRTOS-MPU), (continued)
- Re: [lwip-users] lwip and MPU (FreeRTOS-MPU), Ivan Delamer, 2012/08/29
- Re: [lwip-users] lwip and MPU (FreeRTOS-MPU), jblackarty, 2012/08/29
- Re: [lwip-users] lwip and MPU (FreeRTOS-MPU), Simon Goldschmidt, 2012/08/30
- Re: [lwip-users] lwip and MPU (FreeRTOS-MPU), Krzysztof WesoĊowski, 2012/08/30
- Re: [lwip-users] lwip and MPU (FreeRTOS-MPU), Richard Barry, 2012/08/30
- Re: [lwip-users] lwip and MPU (FreeRTOS-MPU), FreeRTOS Info, 2012/08/30
- Re: [lwip-users] lwip and MPU (FreeRTOS-MPU), Simon Goldschmidt, 2012/08/30
- Re: [lwip-users] lwip and MPU (FreeRTOS-MPU), Richard Barry, 2012/08/30
- Re: [lwip-users] lwip and MPU (FreeRTOS-MPU), Richard Barry, 2012/08/30
- Re: [lwip-users] lwip and MPU (FreeRTOS-MPU), jblackarty, 2012/08/30
- Re: [lwip-users] lwip and MPU (FreeRTOS-MPU),
Simon Goldschmidt <=