lwip-users
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lwip-users] tcp_output() when processing "tcp_input_pcb"


From: Noam weissman
Subject: Re: [lwip-users] tcp_output() when processing "tcp_input_pcb"
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 12:50:43 +0300

Hi,

It depends on what you do and what are the available resources (RAM/ROM).

LwIP is small but it has its limitations.

I am working with a system that has a WEB server, UDP and TCP connections and 
bridging to UART 
all is running at real time. 

If you do not need exceptional throughput its OK.

BR,
Noam.

-----Original Message-----
From: address@hidden [mailto:address@hidden On Behalf Of Numb_Faith
Sent: ג 13 אוגוסט 2013 12:38
To: address@hidden
Subject: Re: [lwip-users] tcp_output() when processing "tcp_input_pcb"

Dear Noam,

Thanks, I'm clear about it.
So if I want to do some application which need real time, I still need the 
RTOS. Though TCP/IP is not a stack which has good performance in the real time 
case.

Best Regards,
Ray Li



--
View this message in context: 
http://lwip.100.n7.nabble.com/tcp-output-when-processing-tcp-input-pcb-tp21783p21793.html
Sent from the lwip-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

_______________________________________________
lwip-users mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users

 
 
************************************************************************************
This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by PineApp 
Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer viruses.
************************************************************************************






************************************************************************************
This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer 
viruses.
************************************************************************************






reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]