[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lwip-users] Fwd: question about using master/head instead of 1.4.1
From: |
Sylvain Rochet |
Subject: |
Re: [lwip-users] Fwd: question about using master/head instead of 1.4.1 |
Date: |
Wed, 14 Jan 2015 12:10:32 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
Hi Thomas,
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 09:05:19AM -0200, Thomas Ubensee wrote:
> Hy Sylvain,
>
> thank you for the very quick response. So when we choose to merge the new
> PPP code into version 1.4.1 which branch would you recommend?
Erm, the PPP new code is in, and now only in, the master branch.
Sylvain
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- Re: [lwip-users] Fwd: question about using master/head instead of 1.4.1, Sylvain Rochet, 2015/01/14
- Message not available
- Re: [lwip-users] Fwd: question about using master/head instead of 1.4.1,
Sylvain Rochet <=
- Re: [lwip-users] Fwd: question about using master/head instead of 1.4.1, Thomas Ubensee, 2015/01/14
- Re: [lwip-users] Fwd: question about using master/head instead of 1.4.1, Sylvain Rochet, 2015/01/14
- Re: [lwip-users] Fwd: question about using master/head instead of 1.4.1, Krzysztof Wesołowski, 2015/01/15
- Re: [lwip-users] Fwd: question about using master/head instead of 1.4.1, Sg, 2015/01/15
- Re: [lwip-users] Fwd: question about using master/head instead of 1.4.1, Sylvain Rochet, 2015/01/16
- Re: [lwip-users] Fwd: question about using master/head instead of 1.4.1, Thomas Ubensee, 2015/01/16
- Re: [lwip-users] Fwd: question about using master/head instead of 1.4.1, Philipp Tölke, 2015/01/16