[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lwip-users] bind with link down
From: |
address@hidden |
Subject: |
Re: [lwip-users] bind with link down |
Date: |
Thu, 2 Apr 2020 20:30:06 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.6.0 |
Am 31.03.2020 um 22:47 schrieb Massimiliano Cialdi:
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 10:11 PM Simon Goldschmidt <address@hidden> wrote:
>> You're mixing link state with admin state here. That might work, but
>> might not work in some situations.
> It's not so clear to me.
> Which pattern should I adopt to keep the link status under control?
> What do you mean by 'admin state'?
"Admin state" is "netif_set_up()".
> How should the admin state be affected by the link state?
Not at all. Just call "netif_set_link_up()" or down when you found out a
state change. Leave "netif_set_up()" as it is.
Regards,
Simon
- Re: [lwip-users] bind with link down,
address@hidden <=
- Re: [lwip-users] bind with link down, Massimiliano Cialdi, 2020/04/02
- Re: [lwip-users] bind with link down, Sylvain Rochet, 2020/04/02
- Re: [lwip-users] bind with link down, Massimiliano Cialdi, 2020/04/02
- Re: [lwip-users] bind with link down, Sylvain Rochet, 2020/04/02
- Re: [lwip-users] bind with link down, Massimiliano Cialdi, 2020/04/03
- Re: [lwip-users] bind with link down, address@hidden, 2020/04/03
- Re: [lwip-users] bind with link down, Massimiliano Cialdi, 2020/04/03
- Re: [lwip-users] bind with link down, address@hidden, 2020/04/03