[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: PATH vs. Path ([Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details]
From: |
Alessandro Vesely |
Subject: |
Re: PATH vs. Path ([Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details] |
Date: |
Sat, 05 Mar 2005 16:57:57 +0100 |
David Baird wrote:
> [...]
> I recall that if I set and exported PATH, then the $(shell) didn't pick
> it up. I can't recall what effect setting Path had.
Possibly the same effect. The code in variable.c tests for "PATH" or "Path"
when setting the target environment. It then treats both cases equally.
A handy option for WINDOWS32 would be to keep the temporary .bat (or .sh)
file in case it fails and the --debug=j option is on. Setting the envirnment
directly in there may have a different effect.
- Re: PATH vs. Path ([Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details], (continued)
- Re: PATH vs. Path ([Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details], Earnie Boyd, 2005/03/08
- Slashes (Re: PATH vs. Path ([Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details], Alessandro Vesely, 2005/03/09
- Re: Slashes (Re: PATH vs. Path ([Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details], David Baird, 2005/03/09
- Re: Slashes (Re: PATH vs. Path ([Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details], Eli Zaretskii, 2005/03/10
- Re: Slashes (Re: PATH vs. Path ([Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript fordetails], Alessandro Vesely, 2005/03/10
- Re: PATH vs. Path ([Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details], David Baird, 2005/03/09
- Re: PATH vs. Path ([Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details], J. Grant, 2005/03/09
- Re: PATH vs. Path ([Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details], David Baird, 2005/03/09
- Re: PATH vs. Path ([Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details], Alessandro Vesely, 2005/03/10
- Re: PATH vs. Path ([Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details], Alessandro Vesely, 2005/03/07
- Re: PATH vs. Path ([Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details],
Alessandro Vesely <=