Re: 'monit stop' and 'monit restart' too dangerous?

[Christian Hopp]

On Fri, 31 Jan 2003, Jan-Henrik Haukeland wrote:

> Rory Toma <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > My vote: 0
> >
> > My vote for anything that ever asks a confirmation: -10
> >
> > On Thu, 2003-01-30 at 16:42, Martin Pala wrote:
>
> > > my vote: 0
>
> my vote: +0
>
> According to our decision guidelines (same as Apache's:
> http://jakarta.apache.org/site/decisions.html)
>
> 0: "Abstain," "no opinion". An abstention may have detrimental effects
> if too many people abstain.
>
> I think this means we keep the current start/stop/restart command line
> arguments.

Actually I am still +1 on it.  Guys, you must have an opinion about
that.  I think a "0" could be used if you do not matter about it or
really canT decide be (no knowledge...).  Even if you think it just
MIGHT not be good simply say "-1"... instead of giving a none vote...
just to please someone.

And Hauk you are right about, "An abstention may have detrimental effects
if too many people abstain."  We are just four people so every opinion
counts.

Christian


-- 
Christian Hopp                                email: address@hidden
Institut für Elektrische Informationstechnik             fon: +49-5323-72-2113
TU Clausthal, Leibnizstr. 28, 38678 Clausthal-Zellerf.   fax: +49-5323-72-3197
                             pgpkey: https://www.iei.tu-clausthal.de/pgp-keys/