monit-dev
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [monit-dev] exec for service test


From: Larry Brigman
Subject: Re: [monit-dev] exec for service test
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 16:24:16 -0700

Then how does the exec and the start/stop scripts work with timeouts
while maintaining the single thread
system?


On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 2:12 PM, Jan-Henrik Haukeland
<address@hidden> wrote:
> Well, this has been on our TODO list for years. It's also up on our priority 
> list at http://mmonit.com/monit/next/ It will require some changes to the 
> Monit check machinery which is why this has been postponed for so long. The 
> reason is that Monit poll each service and attributes in one thread and use 
> non-blocking i/o and timeout to ensure forward progress. To check execution 
> of a program or script it requires that Monit fork and execute the program, 
> wait for x seconds in a separate thread to see if the program has returned or 
> if an error has occurred in the program. Not rocket science at all, but some 
> work. The thing is, Monit is ripe for some code refactoring and we want to 
> wait with implementing this functionally until then. Unfortunately we never 
> seem to find time starting on refactoring though I have hopes later this 
> autumn.
>
>
> On 31. aug. 2010, at 18.13, Larry Brigman wrote:
>
>> I have run across a case where the existing network tests don't work
>> and would like to use exec as the test probe returning
>> success or failure.
>>
>> The case is a process that is an XML service processor but we don't
>> know which port it will be on until it is configured.
>> The request is sent as XML in the header and the response
>> is sent back in the body.
>> Since the XML response can have multiple possibilities of both success
>> and failure depending on the deployment
>> the send/expect doesn't work very well.
>>
>> We already have some python scripts that provide a test of the port
>> but we want to do an active monitor
>> with start stop actions like monit.
>>
>> What would be the easiest way to get exec "script" into the DSL?
>>
>> BTW, I like the method of allowing a service without a pid file.  This
>> service does not have one.
>
> _______________________________________________
> monit-dev mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monit-dev
>



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]