monotone-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Monotone-devel] Key from address@hidden changed?


From: Derek Scherger
Subject: Re: [Monotone-devel] Key from address@hidden changed?
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 10:33:52 -0600
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040813

Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
In message <address@hidden> on 10 Sep 2004 13:58:38 +0200, Peter Simons 
<address@hidden> said:
simons>  | [...]
simons>  | monotone: connecting to venge.net
simons> | monotone: [bytes in: 564] [bytes out: 733] simons> | monotone: warning: key 'address@hidden' is not equal to
simons>  |         key 'address@hidden' in database
simons> | monotone: [bytes in: 612] [bytes out: 770] simons> | monotone: read from fd 7 (peer venge.net) closed OK after goodbye simons> simons> What does this mean? How do I handle this "key change"?

It means that different databases have different keys named
'address@hidden'.  I think Derek said earlier that he had done
some key change, or something like that.

I noticed this the other day as well... graydon's database ended up with a bad key from me which I initially generated when I first got going with monotone. There is nothing in the database signed by this key.

Graydon and I did sort this out the other day and his database now has my good 
key.

To fix the problem you need to delete my old public key from your database.

$ monotone db execute 'delete from public_keys where id = "address@hidden"'

Then sync with graydon and you should be good.

I'm probably partly to blame, as I joined together the data from
Graydon's and from Derek's servers, and got one of those keys while
Graydon got the other, or something like that...  Gah...

It's mostly my fault I think... the first key I generated managed to get out and I hadn't intended that. When I got around to generating a "real" key I noticed the problem.

I'll dig a little in my databases and see if I can do some kind of
recovery that removes this mess.

I take it as an indication that key handling needs to be altered.

Quite possibly. ;) I wasn't all that careful when I generated my first key and it had a particularly bad passphrase. I ended up deleting the database that contained it and starting over while being more careful.

For the record my "good" public key is;

[pubkey address@hidden
MIGdMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4GLADCBhwKBgQDACq6E1Dm1CXq7czaZo4/ycKgqQShewclx
HAcweq0imG/NucgdDgsw/3ZIOq+IVwXya+Axqst3sHz5km8s94XvBcgjzHF1jyeGiN9UEBSN
R+ecT8rF5ogC6OsBpgTMHYASpcuGimLsupz1HE7bz/2o95hIdb6NaV4Ni2FYy/VoiwIBEQ==
[end]

You should end up with this one in your database after the delete and sync described above.
--
Cheers,
Derek




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]