[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Monotone-devel] Hash collisions resiliency
From: |
claw |
Subject: |
[Monotone-devel] Hash collisions resiliency |
Date: |
Mon, 11 Apr 2005 17:55:27 -0700 |
User-agent: |
tin/1.7.8-20050315 ("Scalpay") (UNIX) (Linux/2.6.10 (i686)) |
I have read the documentation on hash integrity, but it doesn't address
my particular questions, which are:
Should there be a hash collision:
-- Would I care?
-- If I did care, how would I know that there had been a collision?
-- How would I continue to work with Monotone without changing any
source files in the collision case? (Assume that they are immutable
binary files for the sake of the question)
Please understand that I do realise the improbability of a collision.
--
J C Lawrence
---------(*) Satan, oscillate my metallic sonatas.
address@hidden He lived as a devil, eh?
http://www.kanga.nu/~claw/ Evil is a name of a foeman, as I live.
- [Monotone-devel] Hash collisions resiliency,
claw <=
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Hash collisions resiliency, Jon Bright, 2005/04/13
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Hash collisions resiliency, J C Lawrence, 2005/04/13
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Hash collisions resiliency, Jon Bright, 2005/04/13
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Hash collisions resiliency, J C Lawrence, 2005/04/13
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Hash collisions resiliency, Nathan Myers, 2005/04/13
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Hash collisions resiliency, tekHedd, 2005/04/13
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Hash collisions resiliency, Nathan Myers, 2005/04/14
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Hash collisions resiliency, Nathaniel Smith, 2005/04/14
- [Monotone-devel] Re: Hash collisions resiliency, Frank Ch. Eigler, 2005/04/14
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Hash collisions resiliency, Nathaniel Smith, 2005/04/15