Re: [Monotone-devel] Push can pretend it is successful while it is not

[Matthew A. Nicholson]

Richard Levitte wrote:
> Nathaniel Smith writes:
>
> > Eh, yeah, the savannah one rather sucks.  Unfortunately, all the
> > bugtrackers I've spent much time with have rather sucked too, so I
> > have trouble getting really excited about upgrading my suck (though
> > I'm pretty sure we can do better than Bugzilla).  IOW, if someone
> > makes something better, I'll use it, but I'm not going to figure out
> > how to administer such a thing myself this week...
> > I _would_ love to have something that made it easier to manage "todo"
> > type lists, and was ergonomic to deal with (i.e., "it shouldn't take 5
> > minutes of clicking around to enter a bug") -- that could replace
> > things like http://venge.net/monotone/quickies.html ...
>
>
> I already use RT, and could easily create more queues.  Todo lists are 
> quite easy to set up, just take ownership over the requests you want to 
> deal with, and they will show on the page you get when you log in.  
> There's also a FAQ manager that's easily integrated.
> I'm also looking at otrs and have ben thinking about debbugs...
> Anyhow, if you'd like me to set up a queue for monotone in RT, just say 
> the word.
> Cheers,
> Richard

We use RT here, and hate it.  We also use mantis (http://mantisbt.org), 
which works pretty well, and is much easier to use than Bugzilla which I 
also happen to dislike.


--
Matthew A. Nicholson
Digium