Re: [Monotone-devel] Equivalent of CVS "sticky tags"

[Andy Jones]

!!! Like this?

monotone testresult -k address@hidden yes
monotone testresult -k address@hidden yes

Brilliant.  Because you clearly don't want to remember who the tester
is, just what test he or she was doing.  Works for me...

Is it in the "to do list" to add a more detailed discussion of this to
the manual?  I think perhaps it should be...

On 14/09/05, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker <address@hidden> wrote:
> In message <address@hidden> on Wed, 14 Sep 2005 14:48:28 +0100, Andy Jones 
> <address@hidden> said:
> 
> andyjwork> Now I understand you can acheive something like this using
> andyjwork> monotone testresult.  But that only allows for +one+ test.
> andyjwork> What if I want to run seperate unit and system testing
> andyjwork> copies of my tree?
> 
> You base it on the key.  One key for each test.  Read about the lua
> hook accept_testresult_change in the manual.
> 
> Cheers,
> Richard
> 
> -----
> Please consider sponsoring my work on free software.
> See http://www.free.lp.se/sponsoring.html for details.
> 
> --
> Richard Levitte                         address@hidden
>                                        http://richard.levitte.org/
> 
> "When I became a man I put away childish things, including
>  the fear of childishness and the desire to be very grown up."
>                                                -- C.S. Lewis
>