Thomas Keller wrote:
Sounds cool. Of course, trac would need monotone support for this to
work and it would have to be maintained as monotone changes and
matures further....
Thomas Moschny is the author of TracMonotone
http://www.ipd.uni-karlsruhe.de/~moschny/TracMonotone/
Ah, nice. Well, I'm not really wedded to our existing wiki, BTS, or
source viewer. They all accumulated without much direct co-ordination on
our webpage because:
- Someone was willing to set them up (not me)
- Someone was willing to maintain them (also not me)
So I can't really look at them in a negative light; but if all the
people currently maintaining bits and pieces of our co-ordination
infrastructure would be happy moving to a trac setup, I would not mind.
I'm not sure if njs or others would mind.
Trac does seem pleasant and well-integrated, to me.
-graydon