[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: optimized SHA1 (was Re: [Monotone-devel] net.venge.monotone.experime
From: |
Jack Lloyd |
Subject: |
Re: optimized SHA1 (was Re: [Monotone-devel] net.venge.monotone.experiment.performance) |
Date: |
Sat, 5 Aug 2006 11:34:03 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.11 |
On Sat, Aug 05, 2006 at 08:34:01AM -0400, Jack Lloyd wrote:
> I'm not entirely sure why the benchmarks come out better using the EVP
> wrappers than directly calling the asm code.
Ah, was just a stupid bug on my part, performance is pretty much
exactly the same between the direct asm calling and EVP versions
now. I've attached the code if anyone wants to play with it. Just
need to link in the output of sha1-586.pl.
-Jack
sha160.h
Description: Text document
sha160.cpp
Description: Text document
- Re: [Monotone-devel] net.venge.monotone.experiment.performance, (continued)
- Re: [Monotone-devel] net.venge.monotone.experiment.performance, Eric Anderson, 2006/08/02
- Re: [Monotone-devel] net.venge.monotone.experiment.performance, Nathaniel Smith, 2006/08/05
- Re: [Monotone-devel] net.venge.monotone.experiment.performance, Eric Anderson, 2006/08/06
- Re: [Monotone-devel] net.venge.monotone.experiment.performance, Nathaniel Smith, 2006/08/06
- Re: [Monotone-devel] net.venge.monotone.experiment.performance, Eric Anderson, 2006/08/06
- Re: [Monotone-devel] net.venge.monotone.experiment.performance, Nathaniel Smith, 2006/08/06
- Re: [Monotone-devel] net.venge.monotone.experiment.performance, Eric Anderson, 2006/08/07
optimized SHA1 (was Re: [Monotone-devel] net.venge.monotone.experiment.performance), Nathaniel Smith, 2006/08/05
[Monotone-devel] Re: optimized SHA1, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker, 2006/08/05
Re: optimized SHA1 (was Re: [Monotone-devel] net.venge.monotone.experiment.performance), Johan Bolmsjö, 2006/08/05