[Monotone-devel] Re: monomercurial sync

[Bruce Stephens]

Lapo Luchini <address@hidden> writes:

> Sooner or later there has to be a monotone-mercurial bidirectional
> sync tool and, given the similarities in the way the DAG is used in
> bith, I guess it would have perfect sense for that to be a specific
> tool, and not an evolution of Tailer or other similar generic tools.

I believe there's something like this for mercurial-git (fast
incremental importer, at least one way, possibly both).  (Now that
mercurial has local branches, it makes sense to contemplate
representing what's in a git repository.)

[...]