Re: [Monotone-devel] Annotate changes break tests?

[Thomas Moschny]

On Thursday 13 September 2007, William Uther wrote:
>    It seems the recent annotate changes in
> ae0a9c829c508851a9bcfbcc22d6b088ab472ff6 don't pass the test suite.
> Is this because the tests were broken too?

"Broken" is maybe too hard. Ralf brought back in sync the docs and mtn's 
behavior for annotate with and without --brief, and the tests also have to be 
fixed accordingly.

But, while we are at it, the discrepancy between docs and behavior showed 
that --brief is really a bad name for that switch, so we should use something 
more intuitive like --only-revs (which would invert the meaning again, yes, 
the human readable form with author and date should be the default.)

- Thomas

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.