[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Monotone-devel] could we get away with requiring perl during the bu
From: |
jack-monotone |
Subject: |
Re: [Monotone-devel] could we get away with requiring perl during the build, for botan's sake? |
Date: |
Mon, 15 Oct 2007 14:47:38 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.1i |
On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 01:09:46PM -0700, Zack Weinberg wrote:
> I noticed yesterday while updating AUTHORS that our copy of Botan is
> way out of date. The newer version has some nice things in it - for
> example, tuned assembly versions of SHA1 - but the catch is, you
> configure the library for the target processor etc. with a Perl
> script. I am not wanting to rewrite the thing in Autoconf. Would
> requiring a working Perl installation (it doesn't look like it needs
> anything beyond a basic 5.x perl) be too much of a hindrance?
I vote[0] for the new Botan, perl dependency and all.
Cheers,
--Jack
--
Jack (John) Cummings http://mudshark.org/
PGP fingerprint: F18B 13A3 6D06 D48A 598D 42EA 3D53 BDC8 7917 F802
pgp0k4CcwfpXp.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- [Monotone-devel] could we get away with requiring perl during the build, for botan's sake?, Zack Weinberg, 2007/10/15
- Re: [Monotone-devel] could we get away with requiring perl during the build, for botan's sake?,
jack-monotone <=
- Re: [Monotone-devel] could we get away with requiring perl during the build, for botan's sake?, Matthew Gregan, 2007/10/15
- [Monotone-devel] Re: could we get away with requiring perl during the build, for botan's sake?, Koen Kooi, 2007/10/16
- [Monotone-devel] Re: could we get away with requiring perl during the build, for botan's sake?, Lapo Luchini, 2007/10/16
- Re: [Monotone-devel] could we get away with requiring perl during the build, for botan's sake?, Markus Schiltknecht, 2007/10/16