[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Monotone-devel] 0.99, 0.999, ...
From: |
Thomas Moschny |
Subject: |
Re: [Monotone-devel] 0.99, 0.999, ... |
Date: |
Mon, 14 Jun 2010 16:55:27 +0200 |
Am Mon, 14 Jun 2010 10:33:57 -0400
schrieb address@hidden:
> When monotone started, did it start as 0.01, 0.02, ... 0.09, 0.10,
> 0.11, ... or did it start 0.1, 0.2, ... 0.9, 0.10? If the former,
> we're using two-digit integers, but they could be interpreted as
> rationals, so we haven't run out. If the latter, the next would be
> 0.100.
The first commit in my db here (on 2003-09-04, from Graydon) has the
commit message: "0.4 release".
So, from that point of view, 0.100 would indeed be the next after 0.99,
if we don't want to release 1.0. But we should try to avoid going that
route again.
- Thomas
--
Thomas Moschny <address@hidden>
- [Monotone-devel] monotone 0.48 released, Thomas Keller, 2010/06/13
- Re: [Monotone-devel] monotone 0.48 released, Stephen Leake, 2010/06/14
- Re: [Monotone-devel] monotone 0.48 released, Thomas Keller, 2010/06/14
- Re: [Monotone-devel] monotone 0.48 released, Timothy Brownawell, 2010/06/14
- Re: [Monotone-devel] 0.99, 0.999, ..., hendrik, 2010/06/14
- Re: [Monotone-devel] 0.99, 0.999, ...,
Thomas Moschny <=
Re: [Monotone-devel] monotone 0.48 released, Zbigniew Zagórski, 2010/06/14
Re: [Monotone-devel] monotone 0.48 released, Howard Spindel, 2010/06/16
- Re: [Monotone-devel] monotone 0.48 released, Stephen Leake, 2010/06/16
- Re: [Monotone-devel] monotone 0.48 released, Thomas Keller, 2010/06/17
- Re: [Monotone-devel] monotone 0.48 released, Stephen Leake, 2010/06/17
- Re: [Monotone-devel] monotone 0.48 released, Stephen Leake, 2010/06/18
- Re: [Monotone-devel] monotone 0.48 released, Thomas Keller, 2010/06/21
- Re: [Monotone-devel] monotone 0.48 released, Stephen Leake, 2010/06/21