RE: [Nano-devel] Nano ported to nsr-tandem-nsk.

[Bates, Tom]

Hi David,

(1): Yes I missed it.  Thanks.

(2): I moved "floss.h" to "nano.h" and it works fine.

- Tom


-----Original Message-----
From: David L. Ramsey [mailto:address@hidden 
Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2004 10:52 AM
To: Bates, Tom
Cc: address@hidden
Subject: Re: [Nano-devel] Nano ported to nsr-tandem-nsk.


>Please accept the diffs below.
>
>Thanks,
>Tom Bates

Thank you.  I can get this into nano 1.3.2.  However, I have two quick
questions first:

1. There's one snippet of code in rcfile.c that assumes that the user id
for root is 0 that your patch doesn't cover.  Is this an oversight?

2. Does floss.h have to be included at the top of nano.c?  I only ask
because I'd like to keep the platform-specific #defines in nano.h
whenever possible.  Will the port still work properly if floss.h is
included at the top of nano.h (after the NANO_H include guard) instead?

I've come up with a slightly modified version of your patch, against
current 1.3.1-cvs, that covers the rcfile.c case and includes floss.h in
nano.h.  It's attached if you want to test it to see if it still works.