[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nano-devel] do_para_begin bug
From: |
David Benbennick |
Subject: |
Re: [Nano-devel] do_para_begin bug |
Date: |
Thu, 29 Jul 2004 15:17:14 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.1i |
On Thu, Jul 29, 2004 at 05:25:36AM +0200, David Lawrence Ramsey wrote:
> I have one quick question, though: why is old_place set
> to the value of xplustabs() instead of just placewewant?
Good catch. I was working on some changes in winio.c, and that
accidentally crept into my patch.
> However, for now, I'd like to stay with the idea of not using static
> functions, though, since the code's still in flux to such a degree that
> having to keep track of both static and non-static functions now will
> just make things more complicated than they need to be.
Yeah, I didn't think you'd let that through; but it was worth a try. :)
Here's a new synced patch, with your suggested changes.
nano.patch
Description: Text document
pgp9Mto1XqJ7W.pgp
Description: PGP signature