[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nano-devel] Updated FIX for undo/redo (SPLIT removal)
From: |
Mark Majeres |
Subject: |
Re: [Nano-devel] Updated FIX for undo/redo (SPLIT removal) |
Date: |
Tue, 27 May 2014 10:46:11 -0700 |
> Ah, pico compatibility! Pico is meant for composing emails, and there
> users want the text to autowrap, and when they later add or delete
> some words, they want to be able to hit ^J to rejustify the paragraph.
> So, yes, the default (having nowrap unset) has to stay.
Benno,
I'm a little confused, isn't the nowrap setting independent of justify, ^J ?
When I was using nano with nowrap unset, nothing special happened
unless I reduced the width of the terminal to be smaller than a line
of text. But even then, nothing happened until I started typing on
the line. Then the line would wrap, and only that line. A permanent
hard break was added that became part of the document. The location
of the break was determined by the width of the terminal.
I can see the use for justify, but not for nowrap.
-Mark
- Re: [Nano-devel] Updated FIX for undo/redo (SPLIT removal), (continued)
- Re: [Nano-devel] Updated FIX for undo/redo (SPLIT removal), Mark Majeres, 2014/05/25
- Re: [Nano-devel] Updated FIX for undo/redo (merged), Benno Schulenberg, 2014/05/25
- Re: [Nano-devel] Updated FIX for undo/redo (SPLIT removal), Mark Majeres, 2014/05/26
- Re: [Nano-devel] Updated FIX for undo/redo (SPLIT removal), Benno Schulenberg, 2014/05/26
- Re: [Nano-devel] Updated FIX for undo/redo (SPLIT removal), Mark Majeres, 2014/05/27
- Re: [Nano-devel] Updated FIX for undo/redo (SPLIT removal), Benno Schulenberg, 2014/05/27
- Re: [Nano-devel] Updated FIX for undo/redo (SPLIT removal),
Mark Majeres <=
- [Nano-devel] the mechanics of wrapping, Benno Schulenberg, 2014/05/27