[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nano-devel] a proposed slight change in behaviour
From: |
Chris Allegretta |
Subject: |
Re: [Nano-devel] a proposed slight change in behaviour |
Date: |
Tue, 17 Jun 2014 14:01:02 -0400 |
On 6/17/14, Mark Majeres <address@hidden> wrote:
> On 6/17/14, Benno Schulenberg <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> Okay. So when ^K clears the mark, a subsequent ^K should clear
>> the cutbuffer. Yes?
>>
>> Benno
>>
>
> My vote is yes, and the latest version of the cutbuffer_reset patch
> already reflects this for both cutting and copying.
Agreed
- Re: [Nano-devel] having text marked/selected, (continued)
- Re: [Nano-devel] having text marked/selected, Benno Schulenberg, 2014/06/13
- Re: [Nano-devel] having text marked/selected, Mark Majeres, 2014/06/13
- [Nano-devel] a proposed slight change in behaviour, Benno Schulenberg, 2014/06/14
- Re: [Nano-devel] a proposed slight change in behaviour, Benno Schulenberg, 2014/06/14
- Re: [Nano-devel] a proposed slight change in behaviour, Mark Majeres, 2014/06/14
- Re: [Nano-devel] a proposed slight change in behaviour, Mark Majeres, 2014/06/14
- Re: [Nano-devel] a proposed slight change in behaviour, Benno Schulenberg, 2014/06/17
- Re: [Nano-devel] a proposed slight change in behaviour, Chris Allegretta, 2014/06/16
- Re: [Nano-devel] a proposed slight change in behaviour, Benno Schulenberg, 2014/06/17
- Re: [Nano-devel] a proposed slight change in behaviour, Mark Majeres, 2014/06/17
- Re: [Nano-devel] a proposed slight change in behaviour,
Chris Allegretta <=