[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nano-devel] polished git repo
From: |
Kamil Dudka |
Subject: |
Re: [Nano-devel] polished git repo |
Date: |
Thu, 18 Feb 2016 20:45:21 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/4.14.8 (Linux/4.1.15-gentoo-r1; KDE/4.14.8; x86_64; ; ) |
On Thursday, February 18, 2016 20:12:18 Benno Schulenberg wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2016, at 17:31, Chris Allegretta wrote:
> > I've not been following this svn / git tag discussion closely enough
> > to comment, but clearly it would be important to have an entry in the
> > git repo for every SVN commit, ideally with the revision original SVN
> > commit number in the git commit msg.
>
> Okay. I just thought these lines were unesthetic and distracting,
It is easy to rewrite them by git-filter-branch and sed to whatever format
you like. As long as the format is machine-readable, I am fine with that.
Kamil
> but if there is no other way to find back the commit that belongs
> to a certain SVN revision, then let them stay.
>
> Benno
- [Nano-devel] polished git repo, Mike Frysinger, 2016/02/16
- Re: [Nano-devel] polished git repo, Kamil Dudka, 2016/02/16
- Re: [Nano-devel] polished git repo, Mike Frysinger, 2016/02/16
- Re: [Nano-devel] polished git repo, Benno Schulenberg, 2016/02/17
- Re: [Nano-devel] polished git repo, Mike Frysinger, 2016/02/17
- Re: [Nano-devel] polished git repo, Kamil Dudka, 2016/02/17
- Re: [Nano-devel] polished git repo, Benno Schulenberg, 2016/02/18
- Re: [Nano-devel] polished git repo, Kamil Dudka, 2016/02/18
- Re: [Nano-devel] polished git repo, Chris Allegretta, 2016/02/18
- Re: [Nano-devel] polished git repo, Benno Schulenberg, 2016/02/18
- Re: [Nano-devel] polished git repo,
Kamil Dudka <=
Re: [Nano-devel] polished git repo, Mike Frysinger, 2016/02/16