[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: inc and non-compliant long lines redux
From: |
Ralph Corderoy |
Subject: |
Re: inc and non-compliant long lines redux |
Date: |
Thu, 10 Nov 2022 16:04:56 +0000 |
Hi Andy,
> Not sure where they went... they used to be defined in mh.h:
And elsewhere. They went with C99 being a requirement.
commit c08cb60fe34b42b0a83bc88b57fd41b07793863f
Author: Ralph Corderoy <ralph@inputplus.co.uk>
Date: Mon Sep 4 10:07:35 2017 +0100
Replace FALSE and TRUE with C99's false and true.
Remove the duplicate definitions of FALSE and TRUE. Change a few
variables from int to bool at the same time. The semantics of bool are
different to int because `bool b = 42' maps 42 to 1, but if the code was
relying on that then it needs shaking out anyway.
--
Cheers, Ralph.
- inc and non-compliant long lines redux, Andy Bradford, 2022/11/09
- Re: inc and non-compliant long lines redux, Michael Richardson, 2022/11/10
- Re: inc and non-compliant long lines redux, Ralph Corderoy, 2022/11/13
- Re: inc and non-compliant long lines redux, Andy Bradford, 2022/11/14
- Re: inc and non-compliant long lines redux, Ken Hornstein, 2022/11/14
- Re: inc and non-compliant long lines redux, Andy Bradford, 2022/11/14
- Re: inc and non-compliant long lines redux, Ralph Corderoy, 2022/11/15
- Re: inc and non-compliant long lines redux, Ken Hornstein, 2022/11/15
- Re: inc and non-compliant long lines redux, Andy Bradford, 2022/11/16
- Message not available
- Re: inc and non-compliant long lines redux, Ken Hornstein, 2022/11/16
- Re: inc and non-compliant long lines redux, Andy Bradford, 2022/11/16
- Re: inc and non-compliant long lines redux, Ken Hornstein, 2022/11/16