[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: flist -- "Killed" -- oom (*not* 1.8 related)
From: |
David Levine |
Subject: |
Re: flist -- "Killed" -- oom (*not* 1.8 related) |
Date: |
Sat, 4 Mar 2023 16:57:28 -0600 |
Ken wrote:
> This does suggest to me we should probably change the internal API
> so sparse message ranges are handled better;
Yes, that would be a nice enhancement.
In the meantime, an occasional folder(1) -pack might solve the problem manually.
David
- Re: flist -- "Killed" -- oom (*not* 1.8 related), (continued)
- Re: flist -- "Killed" -- oom (*not* 1.8 related), Simon Burge, 2023/03/02
- Re: flist -- "Killed" -- oom (*not* 1.8 related), Conrad Hughes, 2023/03/02
- Re: flist -- "Killed" -- oom (*not* 1.8 related), Simon Burge, 2023/03/02
- Re: flist -- "Killed" -- oom (*not* 1.8 related), Ken Hornstein, 2023/03/02
- Re: flist -- "Killed" -- oom (*not* 1.8 related), Howard Bampton, 2023/03/02
- Re: flist -- "Killed" -- oom (*not* 1.8 related), Ken Hornstein, 2023/03/02
- Re: flist -- "Killed" -- oom (*not* 1.8 related), George Michaelson, 2023/03/02
- Re: flist -- "Killed" -- oom (*not* 1.8 related),
David Levine <=
- Re: flist -- "Killed" -- oom (*not* 1.8 related), Ken Hornstein, 2023/03/04
- Re: flist -- "Killed" -- oom (*not* 1.8 related), Greg Minshall, 2023/03/05