[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Using OX_WRAPPER machines
From: |
Matt Stanton |
Subject: |
Re: Using OX_WRAPPER machines |
Date: |
Tue Mar 13 02:45:05 2001 |
address@hidden wrote:
>
> I should given you have all the info I know. I assumed you'd know it
> too. __builtin_new is the generic C++ new operator that is builtin to
> GNU C++. It's probably being used in the OX_WRAPPERS ox_create() to
> allocate the class object that is used.
Perhaps ox_wrappers should redefine "new" and "delete" to point to
pkg_alloc() (I think) and ox_free().
Also, it's not just ox_wrappers that's using new and delete - the Filter
class uses them for a few small arrays.
> Ben responded to the post of simplesynth by saying "Cool!" so he must
> have got it working. How did you do it, Ben? :-)
Hm.... I'm not Ben, but I've just been using
"gcc -shared simplesynth.cc -o simplesynth.so"
Matt Stanton
address@hidden
- Using OX_WRAPPER machines, amep, 2001/03/12
- Re: Using OX_WRAPPER machines, David O'Toole, 2001/03/13
- Re: Using OX_WRAPPER machines, amep, 2001/03/13
- Re: Using OX_WRAPPER machines, Knos, 2001/03/13
- Re: Using OX_WRAPPER machines, amep, 2001/03/13
- Re: Using OX_WRAPPER machines, David O'Toole, 2001/03/13
- Re: Using OX_WRAPPER machines, amep, 2001/03/13