octave-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #36236] Boolean indexing not too prominent in


From: anonymous
Subject: [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #36236] Boolean indexing not too prominent in the docs.
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 07:21:10 +0000
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_6_8) AppleWebKit/534.55.3 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1.5 Safari/534.55.3

URL:
  <http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?36236>

                 Summary: Boolean indexing not too prominent in the docs.
                 Project: GNU Octave
            Submitted by: None
            Submitted on: Mi 18 Apr 2012 07:21:10 UTC
                Category: None
                Severity: 3 - Normal
                Priority: 5 - Normal
              Item Group: Documentation
                  Status: None
             Assigned to: None
         Originator Name: Alexander Klein
        Originator Email: address@hidden
             Open/Closed: Open
         Discussion Lock: Any
                 Release: 3.6.1
        Operating System: Any

    _______________________________________________________

Details:

I was just browsing the manual, and I noticed that 'boolean indexing' seems to
be mentioned exactly once, namely in the section about 'Basic vectorization'.

The section about index expressions, however, states that "Indices may be
scalars, vectors, ranges, or the special operator ‘:’, which may be used
to select entire rows or columns."

I think boolean indexing should be made more prominent, since although I've
been using Octave for nearly a decade, boolean indexing managed to escape my
notice until only a few weeks ago.

Thanks,

Alex




    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?36236>

_______________________________________________
  Nachricht gesendet von/durch Savannah
  http://savannah.gnu.org/




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]