[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #38131] implied set() within plot() isn't cons
|
From: |
Rik |
|
Subject: |
[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #38131] implied set() within plot() isn't consistent with set() |
|
Date: |
Wed, 23 Jan 2013 06:05:17 +0000 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux x86_64; rv:18.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/18.0 |
Follow-up Comment #3, bug #38131 (project octave):
Probably right. Too much work for too little gain; especially when there are
easy workarounds.
Workarounds:
1) Provide the PROP/VALUE settings as pairs in the call to plot instead of in
a cell array.
2) Use the return handle from plot and a separate call to set as in.
h = plot (...)
set (h, {PROPS}, {VALUES})
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?38131>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Savannah
http://savannah.gnu.org/