[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #40450] edit new.m file behaviour

[Rik]

Follow-up Comment #13, bug #40450 (project octave):

Behavior generally seems right.  It would be nice to use octave-qt-link, but
as a first step you might commit this fix.  That way if you don't get enough
time to implement the octave-qt-link before the release the behavior will
still be better.

On a second note, if edit is changed to behave like the GUI would fixing bug
#40502 become trivial?  It seems like there is the possibility to get the code
right in edit.m and octave-qt-link and then when someone does
File->New->Function the GUI would actually just call edit.m with a filename
like "new_function.m"

    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?40450>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via/by Savannah
  http://savannah.gnu.org/