|
From: | John W. Eaton |
Subject: | [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #44175] GUI differences between qt and fltk |
Date: | Tue, 03 Feb 2015 23:25:15 +0000 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/31.0 Iceweasel/31.2.0 |
Follow-up Comment #6, bug #44175 (project octave): I'm currently working on improving mouse interaction along with the zoom, pan, and rotate3d functions so they are a bit more compatible with Matlab. Once the Qt-based plot windows work well and https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?44116 is solved, is there any reason to keep the FLTK version around? It seems like a waste of effort to me to try to keep them functionally equivalent. _______________________________________________________ Reply to this item at: <http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?44175> _______________________________________________ Message sent via/by Savannah http://savannah.gnu.org/
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |