octave-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #48905] lssa: lscomplex and fastlscomplex beha


From: Rafael Laboissiere
Subject: [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #48905] lssa: lscomplex and fastlscomplex behave differently
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2016 19:55:43 +0000 (UTC)
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/52.0.2743.116 Safari/537.36

URL:
  <http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?48905>

                 Summary: lssa: lscomplex and fastlscomplex behave differently
                 Project: GNU Octave
            Submitted by: rlaboiss
            Submitted on: Thu 25 Aug 2016 07:55:40 PM GMT
                Category: Octave Forge Package
                Severity: 3 - Normal
                Priority: 5 - Normal
              Item Group: Incorrect Result
                  Status: None
             Assigned to: None
         Originator Name: 
        Originator Email: 
             Open/Closed: Open
         Discussion Lock: Any
                 Release: other
        Operating System: GNU/Linux

    _______________________________________________________

Details:

If I understand correctly, lscomplex and fastlscomplex implement the same
functionality, but in Octave or in C++ language, respectively.  If this is
true, then they should yield identical results for the same arguments.  Now,
this does not seem to be the case in version 0.1.2 of the lssa package:


octave:1> pkg load lssa
octave:2> maxfreq = 4 / ( 2 * pi );
octave:3> t = [0:0.008:8];
octave:4> x = (2 .* sin (maxfreq .* t) +
      3 .* sin ((3 / 4) * maxfreq .* t) -
      0.5 .* sin ((1/4) * maxfreq .* t) -
      0.2 .* cos (maxfreq .* t) +
      cos ((1/4) * maxfreq .* t));
octave:5> lscomplex (t, x, maxfreq, 2, 2)
ans =

  -0.40092 - 2.37156i   1.21807 - 2.25613i   1.93543 - 1.53949i   2.13669 -
0.98053i

octave:6> fastlscomplex (t, x, maxfreq, 2, 2)
ans =

  -0.4009 - 2.3716i   1.2181 - 2.2561i   0.1751 - 2.3014i   1.0019 - 2.0248i






    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?48905>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via/by Savannah
  http://savannah.gnu.org/




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]